User talk:Fady Nabil Ibrahim

This is Fady Nabil Ibrahim's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monica Sedki (July 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheImaCow was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Monica Sedki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Monica Sedki, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 08:41, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fady Nabil Ibrahim! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 08:41, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monica Sedki (July 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Monica Sedki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Monica Sedki, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 10:02, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monica Sedki (July 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Declining; the draft does not cite the level of in-depth, independent coverage in reliable sources to indicate the subject meets WP:NBIO criteria. All of the sources cited are heavily based on WP:PRIMARY information or are borderline unreliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Monica Sedki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Monica Sedki, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 14:13, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Monica Sedki[edit]

Draft:Monica Sedki, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Monica Sedki and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Monica Sedki during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 04:25, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monica Sedki (July 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Eternal Shadow was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Eternal Shadow Talk 20:19, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TeKeya[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on TeKeya, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.   Kadzi   (talk) 22:09, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from TeKeya, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. — — — Demonichellbringer (Discussion) 22:29, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TeKeya[edit]

Hello Fady Nabil Ibrahim,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged TeKeya for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 16:02, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 17:28, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Monica Sedki[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Monica Sedki, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Java Hurricane 10:32, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Maxim Haartsen[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Maxim Haartsen, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GILO A&E⇑ 21:12, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Maxim Haartsen. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. GILO A&E⇑ 21:20, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your primary purpose in editing with this account has been to create promotional articles regarding TeKeya and individuals involved in the company. If you will be pursuing an unblock, you will need to declare your conflict in accordance with our Terms of Use.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock my account[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fady Nabil Ibrahim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Tekeya is a startup in Egypt. Sedky and Haartsen are one of the people who have startups in Egypt. I only support startups in my country and add articles about them. I just want to help startups and contribute to Wikipedia. Really, I didn't know about these policies and some of the things I contributed were propaganda, and I'd be really careful in the future. I understood that the type of articles I was writing on was some publicity I knew this from the Wikipedia support team, and I didn't know the publicity was wrong on Wikipedia. I really hope to lift the ban from participating in the encyclopedia and add articles on entrepreneurs in my country because my country has many startups. I undertake not to edit topics that I have related to. I promise not to violate it again.

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not a platform for supporting startups, but only includes articles on companies that have already met the notability requirements of WP:NCORP (and WP:NPERSON for individuals). If you wish to edit Wikipedia, you will need to find something else to write about. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:40, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you want to request unblock again, please make a new unblock request, do not rewrite the previous one and overwrite the decline - the next reviewing admin will need to see all of your past requests. So you need to *copy* the following text to the bottom of your page, and then edit that to fill in your unblock reason: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} (And as it says in the "hidden" text, Do not include the "tlx|" part - just copy it as you see it displayed on the page.) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:11, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock my account[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fady Nabil Ibrahim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Tekeya is a startup in Egypt. Sedky and Haartsen are one of the people who have startups in Egypt. I only support startups in my country and add articles about them. I just want to help startups and contribute to Wikipedia. Now I know that Wikipedia is not a platform for supporting startups and I didn't know about these policies and some of the things I contributed were propaganda, and I'd be really careful in the future. I understood that the type of articles I was writing on was some publicity I knew this from the Wikipedia support team, and I didn't know the publicity was wrong on Wikipedia. I really hope to lift the ban from participating in the encyclopedia and add articles on entrepreneurs in my country because my country has many startups. I undertake not to edit topics that I have related to. I promise not to violate it again.

Decline reason:

You are now outright trolling. No, obviously not. Yamla (talk) 12:17, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Delete Account[edit]

{db-u1|rationale= Working on Wikipedia is difficult and my account has been blocked and support has not helped me}

Neither accounts nor user talk pages may be deleted. --Yamla (talk) 13:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fady Nabil Ibrahim. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:45, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fady Nabil Ibrahim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to unblock the ban because I really am not an expert on Wikipedia and I am new to Wikipedia and I was not aware of Wikipedia's policies and I did not really know which articles had wrong propaganda and I did not know that my type of writing has propaganda I am not a newspaper editor. And I did not know that this would lead to a ban. I just knew that the article would be deleted, so I used to repeat the same article again with a change in some writing, and that is shown on the talk page. I received the ban suddenly without warning. And I made many requests to lift the ban, and it was not accepted, and I really do not want to bother with the reasons for my ban to be lifted, and also these reasons were mentioned in the previous requests. And after I despair of just the ban, I did something wrong, which was creating a new account to use it, and I really know that I am wrong and I am sorry for that and I did not really repeat that in the future, and I did not cheat again. Just all I want is to unblock me and give me another chance and I will be banned in the future. Thank you very much.

Decline reason:

You may not create additional accounts to evade your block, whether you are honest about who you are or not. The block is on you as a person, not just your account. You may not edit under any account or IP address while this block is in effect. Since you do not seem to understand this, there are no grounds to lift the block, and I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:29, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I want to point out that you promised in your previous unblock requests that you would not attempt to create/edit articles about people/organizations that you had a connection to, but you then attempted to evade your block and immediately created a draft for Menna Shahin. Why should we unblock you if you aren't going to keep your promises? Waggie (talk) 18:30, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I do not break my promise. I promised that i will abide by the special policies of Wikipedia after the ban is lifted, but I am desperate with the large number of requests to unblock the ban. So I had to make another account and did it in my name, meaning I did not lie and trick another name As for Menna Shaheen's article, she is a public figure and you can search on Google and you will find an interview with Google and tedx talk.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Fady Nabil Ibrahim (talk • contribs)

You only need one open request, please do not make additional requests beyond one at a time. Additional comments should be made as standard comments without any formatting added. 331dot (talk) 09:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fady Nabil Ibrahim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to unblock the ban because I really am not an expert on Wikipedia and I am new to Wikipedia and I was not aware of Wikipedia's policies and I did not really know which articles had wrong propaganda and I did not know that my type of writing has propaganda I am not a newspaper editor. And I did not know that this would lead to a ban. I just knew that the article would be deleted, so I used to repeat the same article again with a change in some writing, and that is shown on the talk page. I received the ban suddenly without warning. And I made many requests to lift the ban, and it was not accepted, and I really do not want to bother with the reasons for my ban to be lifted, and also these reasons were mentioned in the previous requests. And after I despair of just the ban, I did something wrong, which was creating a new account to use it, and I really know that I am wrong and I am sorry for that and I did not really repeat that in the future, and I did not cheat again. Just all I want is to unblock me and give me another chance and I will be banned in the future. I do not break my promise. I promised that i will abide by the special policies of Wikipedia after the ban is lifted, but I am desperate with the large number of requests to unblock the ban. So I had to make another account and did it in my name, meaning I did not lie and trick another name As for Menna Shaheen's article, she is a public figure and you can search on Google and you will find an interview with Google and tedx talk. Thank you very much.

Decline reason:

It is not clear to me that you will not continue making the same edits if the block has expired. I believe a standard offer might be appropriate; I am revoking the talk page access as there have been several failed unblock requests and no improvement in their arguments. only (talk) 21:46, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2020[edit]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

only (talk) 21:47, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]