User talk:Falcons745
John Tomkins vs The Bishop[edit]
Yes, the reason given in your edit summary was legitimate, so technically it was wrong of me to rollback your edit (that's why I reverted myself immediately). However, I don't agree with the way you performed the fork, since it is similar to a cut-and-paste move. In my opinion, it would have been better to delete The Bishop, and then move John Tomkins to The Bishop (leaving a redirect at John Tomkins). Since the move is not completely uncontroversial, it would be best to leave a note on the talk page first. Gail (talk) 17:33, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- You're right about the "innocent unless proven guilty" part, that's why I agreed that the article should be moved to The Bishop. And you're probably also right about setting John Tomkins as a stub (with a prominent link, context explained, to The Bishop) rather than a plain redirect. What I don't agree with is that the history of the article construction is presently being left at John Tomkins, rather than being moved to The Bishop (compare John Tomkins history against The Bishop history). I'll be parting on vacation soon, so I can't take care of the issue myself. If you need assistance, try posting at Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests... the people there are generally quite helpful. Gail (talk) 23:51, 30 June 2008 (UTC)