User talk:Family of St. Jerome

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Family of St. Jerome, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Roscelese, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Everymorning (talk) 23:58, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Roscelese[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Roscelese, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Everymorning (talk) 23:58, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Family of St. Jerome (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I initiated a sockpuppet investigation, here. In this sockpuppet investigation, I presented convincing proofs that a number of user accounts were actually sockpuppets of Wiki-PR, a public relations firm who is paid to edit Wikipedia to make its clients look good. User:Everymorning then posted a speedy delete notice on my sockpuppet investigation. User:Everymorning claimed that my sockpuppet investigation was "pure vandalism" but didn't explain why. Then, User:Diannaa speedy deleted my sockpuppet investigation without any discussion. User:Diannaa then blocked me without any warning or discussion at all. The behavior of these users (speedy deleting sockpuppet investigations without any discussion, and blocking me without warning) all seems to go against WP:CONSENSUS. It also makes me even more suspicious that these user accounts are affiliated with Wiki-PR, and they blocked me to stifle any discussion because they want to "cover their tracks" and avoid people finding out that Wiki-PR is still editing Wikipedia.Family of St. Jerome (talk) 13:17, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Strongly concur with WP:NOTHERE assessment. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:00, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.