User talk:Fangirlpunk

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:The Dying Arts (September 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sionk (talk) 17:30, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Dying Arts concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Dying Arts, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Dying Arts

Hello, Fangirlpunk. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "The Dying Arts".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:The Dying Arts}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:31, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Dying Arts (band) (May 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PerfectSoundWhatever was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Remove all references to blogs and any other self-published sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Dying Arts (band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Dying Arts (band), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 15:24, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PerfectSoundWhatever:

Hi PerfectSoundWhateverPerfectSoundWhatever, thank you for reviewing my article. I swapped out a couple of references to what might be perceived as 'self-published', I left one: Alan Cross's blog (a well known music critic) because I pulled a quote from him. If my changes weren't enough do you mind specifying if there are any other problematic sources? There are so many citations I'd be only guessing, and I think the remainders meet the cut -- or like the BlogTO concert listing I cited to backup that a specific show happened.

Thanks for your time! Fangirlpunk (talk) 16:29, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, here's a quick source review:

Discogs hosts user generated content and should be immediately removed (see WP:RSDISCOGS)
ajournalofmusicalthings.com is a Wordpress site. See WP:SPS: "Never use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer." Though, it's arguable whether or not the policy for biographies of living persons applies here since it's a band, see here. (I would personally remove the source but it possibly is able to stay).
http://radio3wiki.info/ appears to be a wiki which falls under WP:UGC.
unappreciatedscholars.com appears to be a WP:SPS (Wordpress site)
culvertmusic.com is a WP:PRIMARY and ideally should be replaced with a reliable, secondary source.
allmusic is sometimes reliable, but not in this case. Allmusic can be used for it's prose, but not it's database listings. See WP:ALLMUSIC.
riffyou.com link is a deadlink.
twitter.com/TheVerge citation is another WP:PRIMARY and ideally should be replaced with a better source
An image is not a reliable source.

Please remember that, per WP:MINREF, contentious statements about living people must have an inline citation. So, if you remove a citation, don't leave the statement unreferenced. So you know, I'll leave the AfC review of this article to someone else in case you re-submit it. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 22:04, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for taking the time! The article will survive if I can't find suitable replacements for these, thanks. Fangirlpunk (talk) 22:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fangirlpunk! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 15:24, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Dying Arts (band) (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No twitter or blogs as sources. I'm sorry- no exceptions to quote the subject. Find another source to establish the quote.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Dying Arts (band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nightenbelle (talk) 17:46, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Dying Arts (band) (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Many the sources are largely announcements rather than actual in-depth reviews. Unappreciated Scholars is (was?) a blog so should not be used and Bucket List Reviews existed to promote artists so a weak source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Dying Arts (band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Dying Arts (band) has been accepted

The Dying Arts (band), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 02:33, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]