User talk:Fanny.Mingh

Help please! I’ve been blocked for an issue I’m not related to. The edits I put up have all been referenced.

Fanny.Mingh (talk) 17:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fanny.Mingh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for two edits I made which were referenced and factual according to the literature I provided. From this I was deduced as a supposed sock of another account. I feel this is somewhat arbitrary, I wished not to troll or abuse I simply wanted to benefit Wikipedia and put an end to the mindless debates swirling on certain local pages. I referenced everything I edited and I do not feel it was fair that I was blocked for an issue I am not related to, but rather tried to solve

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:23, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fanny.Mingh (talk) 17:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

{{unblock A check user has not confirmed that I am abuser of multiple accounts, a patrolling admin has decided that based off two edits I have made which were both referenced and from a book! I am not acting in a manner which is malicious, I’ve merely tried to benefit Wikipedia, please someone must see that I am totally separate from the trolls }}

TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:32, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]