User talk:Fantastiera

Copy within[edit]

Thanks for identifying the source of the material in your edit.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed.S Philbrick (Talk) 12:28, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Since I copied a lot of content in batches, fixing the attribution may be difficult. I've just provided a NOTE with a dummy edit. Can you please check that it's fine and I can continue with the rest, @Sphilbrick:?

AfC notification: Draft:Philosophical pessimism has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Philosophical pessimism. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:36, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Philosophical pessimism has been accepted[edit]

Philosophical pessimism, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:05, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Philosophical pessimists[edit]

Hello, Fantastiera,

Category redirects aren't created like article redirects. Please look at the code on this page so if you need to create a category redirect in the future, you'll do so correctly. Thank you! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:09, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Thank you for fixing my redirect and for the heads-up! Fantastiera (talk) 14:32, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:9C49:EFC2:418A:4038. I noticed that you recently removed all content from a page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:9C49:EFC2:418A:4038 (talk) 00:58, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Efilism" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Efilism has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 15 § Efilism until a consensus is reached. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 02:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that PROD is only for articles and files. WP:RFD is the correct venue for redirects. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 02:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]