User talk:Fbarbe

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fbarbe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am really not sure why I have been blocked, haven't edited in a while and today I was unable to make a minor edit from my phone.

Decline reason:

You personally are not blocked, that's for sure. What message do you see when you try to edit? Can you paste it here? And actually, if the IP or range you're on has been blocked, you might want to go to WP:IPECPROXY and see about request IP block exemption. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:41, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ludii (September 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ludii and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 19:57, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fbarbe! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 19:57, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ludii (November 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ludii and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I'm contacting you as well (as well as the other reviewer), as I am feeling a bit stuck.

This is my first time creating a Wikipedia page, and it's starting to feel a bit frustrating to keep having it rejected without further feedback, despite having worked on the previous points. In particular, I saw that you have just rejected it with the same reasons as the previous two rejections. I have added sources from peer-reviewed journals and news articles, and rephrased part of the page to make it sound less like an advertisement. I have also asked for help

here

, but no one replied so far.

Could you point out some parts of the page that need to be changed, with some tips on what to focus on?

Thanks a lot for the work you do making Wikipedia the awesome place it is!

Fbarbe (talk) 21:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ludii (November 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ludii and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:20, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm posting this here (was previously posted in your user talk page)

Hi!

This is my first time creating a Wikipedia page, and it's starting to feel a bit frustrating to keep having it rejected without further feedback, despite having worked on the previous points. In particular, I saw that you have just rejected it with the same reasons as the previous two rejections. I have added sources from peer-reviewed journals and news articles, and rephrased part of the page to make it sound less like an advertisement. I have also asked for help here, but no one replied so far.

Could you point out some parts of the page that need to be changed, with some tips on what to focus on?

Thanks a lot for the work you do making Wikipedia the awesome place it is!

Fbarbe (talk) 21:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ludii[edit]

Hello, Fbarbe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ludii, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]