User talk:Felipe.diaz
Yes, every fact is indeed referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference. There were zero distractions in the article, everything was associated in some way or another with monoculture. I feel as if the article showed both the negatives and positives of practicing monoculture, therefore it appears to be neutral without leaning excessively to one side or the other. The article has many different sources, most stemming from scientific peer-reviewed journals. Most of the information seems up-to-date, compared to what I have been learning in the classroom. The citations worked for the five I checked out.
Questions: 1. Would it be possible to incorporate conceptions of monoculture held by those with a more radical view if one were to state that these may not be totally accurate, yet it is a camp that exists in the discussion of monoculture? 2. Do you think it might be wise to add a section which references pesticide treadmills and how they affect monoculture?
Felipe.diaz (talk) 06:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Welcome![edit]
Hello, Felipe.diaz, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 07:33, 1 February 2017 (UTC)