User talk:Femin Tushar

October 2017

Hello, I'm Gaelan. I noticed that in this edit to Abhay (2001 film), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. (talk to) Gaelan('s contributions) 02:37, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Abhay (2001 film). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Abhay (2001 film) was changed by Femin Tushar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860641 on 2017-10-14T02:42:56+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:42, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Femin Tushar. You have new messages at Kailash29792's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Unsourced

Is removed unsourced pages. CatSeatch (talk) 10:26, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism, CatSeatch (talk) 10:34, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What is vandalism? okay you want to edit on that page, then continue editing. Femin Tushar (talk) 10:36, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CatSeatch (talk) 10:39, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CatSeatch (talk) 10:42, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 10:51, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]