User talk:FerasWebsite

This is FerasWebsite's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rami Abdel-Rahem (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rami Abdel-Rahem and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FerasWebsite! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to University of Petra have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 12:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to University of Petra. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to University of Petra, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 11:25, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Adakiko,

Can you explain why the article "University of Petra" is an advertisement/promotion article?

Thank you FerasWebsite (talk) 20:40, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at University of Petra. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 13:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not block me, I am trying to write an article that is not an advertisement/promotion. I am new on Wikipedia.

Thank you for your understanding FerasWebsite (talk) 20:42, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from University of Petra. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. The templates "more citations needed" and "primary sources" still apply. Tacyarg (talk) 14:13, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths in 2024, and baseline notability

Hi. I've noticed over the past few days that a large number of your additions (almost always redlinks) are being removed by others due to the lack of baseline notability of the persons reported as dying. I would like to suggest that you become a little more selective and thoughtful about their aspects of notability before adding them. An obituary reporting someone, often of a young age, with a decent professional qualification or occupation does not necessarily mean that that person would likely have a Wikipedia article written about them. Assessing their likelihood for an article is key in deciding whether they have a baseline notability, i.e. a starting point in terms of notability. Flooding the article with untenable redlinks is not something that can be maintained in the long-term, I have to say. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 20:48, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You continue to add non-notable redlinked deceased to the list, and I detect some discord among regular editors there as to this practice. I would again ask that you become very selective in your choice of additions to the list, as many entries are routinely being removed as non-notable without significant internet coverage. Thank you. Ref ^(chew)(do) 06:32, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for engaging at the Deaths in 2024 talk page. Ref ^(chew)(do) 21:46, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have responded to one of your enquiries in a section at the Deaths in 2024 talk page. Ref ^(chew)(do) 14:32, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much FerasWebsite (talk) 15:51, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, when you add people to the Deaths in 2024 page, please note that they should be in alphabetical order under each day. Thank you. --Marbe166 (talk) 08:53, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I will be more diligent next time FerasWebsite (talk) 22:03, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Mail

Hi Feras. You added a source on Deaths in 2024 which came from the Daily Mail. Unfortunately, the Daily Mail is deprecated, which means that you should almost never use the source except for exceptional circumstances. In the future, you can check this list considered reliable and unreliable for use on Wikipedia. I hope you have a great day. TheWikiToby (talk) 00:41, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for letting me know. FerasWebsite (talk) 00:45, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to actually link the list lol. Ima add it in a second. TheWikiToby (talk) 00:48, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]