User talk:Fergyson2010

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomas Egert (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Tomas Egert, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not create multiple copies of drafts. Which copy do you want reviewed?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Fergyson2010/sandbox/Tomas Egert and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Fergyson2010/sandbox/Tomas Egert, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:36, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fergyson2010! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:36, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomas Egert has been accepted

Tomas Egert, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:41, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you recently removed content from Adam Murray without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:50, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Adam Murray, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:57, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Gerry McDonagh, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kosack (talk) 13:06, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Fergyson2010/sandbox/Tomas Egert

Hello, Fergyson2010. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/Tomas Egert".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Home Lander (talk) 18:30, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. I have found and added a source for your changes to the Pete Wild article, but please ensure you include a source yourself in future. Please let me know if you have any questions or queries. Thanks, Giant Snowman 07:49, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Shaq McDonald. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:36, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]