User talk:Fernbom2

Welcome!

Hello, Fernbom2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Ardagh Glass Group, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Refreshingapathy (talk) 06:28, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ardagh Glass Group[edit]

A tag has been placed on Ardagh Glass Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Refreshingapathy (talk) 06:28, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jørgen Brahe[edit]

The article Jørgen Brahe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page without blue links.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 14:45, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:STANDARDSORTERING listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:STANDARDSORTERING. Since you had some involvement with the Template:STANDARDSORTERING redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Paul A (talk) 07:56, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notification! I have nothing to say. If you want to delete it it is no problem to me. Fernbom2 (talk) 08:36, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FreePBX (2nd nomination)[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FreePBX (2nd nomination). - Eastmain (talk) 01:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Earl of Torrington[edit]

Good eye! That was indeed vandalism; it has been fixed. DS (talk) 01:44, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:HramPodgorica.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:HramPodgorica.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:16, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't forget[edit]

Please don't forget to notify the creator of an article when you nominate for CSD, e.g. Joel Yake--SPhilbrick T 14:36, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ludvig Maribo Benjamin Aubert[edit]

Hi, thanks for merging that article to Ludvig Aubert. But please remember that perWP:MERGE you must attribute the source of the material you merged by way of a link in the edit summary. Otherwise you do not comply with the attribution requirements of Wikipedia's licence. Thanks, Sandstein 07:02, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I should have thought of that. Thank you for reminding me! Fernbom2 (talk) 16:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! -Mike Restivo (talk) 20:01, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Declined speedy deletion of Still Echo[edit]

Just to let you know, I've declined your speedy deletion of Still Echo because it doesn't meet the WP:A2 criteria (which I think you were trying to use) as it is not a direct copy from the Swedish Wikipedia (its in English). You can still take it to Articles for Deletion or Propose it for deletion if you still think that it needs deleting. --Mrmatiko (talk) 08:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I tried again with a correct criterion! Fernbom2 (talk) 04:58, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Music in Cologne[edit]

Category:Music in Cologne, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 21:50, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Music in Dresden[edit]

Category:Music in Dresden, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 21:51, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Music in Düsseldorf[edit]

Category:Music in Düsseldorf, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 21:52, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Music in Frankfurt[edit]

Category:Music in Frankfurt, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 21:53, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Music in Hamburg[edit]

Category:Music in Hamburg, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 21:53, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Music in Jerusalem[edit]

Category:Music in Jerusalem, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 21:54, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Music in Lugano[edit]

Category:Music in Lugano, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 21:56, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Music in Munich[edit]

Category:Music in Munich, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 21:57, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request for your perspective on SOPA[edit]

Hi Fernbom2, there's currently an ongoing discussion about splitting the Stop Online Piracy Act page at Talk:Stop_Online_Piracy_Act#ONGOING_DISCUSSION_-_Splitting_the_Article. You've familiarized yourself with the entry before, and your insight and perspective on the matter would be appreciated. Hope to see you there, Sloggerbum (talk) 23:54, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Otto/Oskar Lesser[edit]

Hey, I was just passing by Otto Lesser and saw that you'd moved the article to its current location (from Oskar Lesser) in 2009. I was wondering if you had any personal knowledge on the subject or access to sources, or if you moved it purely because that's the name given in the lede? If the latter that might be problematic given the lede was changed by an anon editor way back in 2007. Now, there's no source for either name being correct, and the editor who created the article's been inactive for five years, but I think there's a distinct possibility we've been calling this guy by the wrong name for the past two years. What do you think? – hysteria18 (talk) 14:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there has been a discussion on German Wikipedia about the name. There are sources with "Otto" and "Oskar" was delteted in 2009. Fernbom2 (talk) 23:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited French School at Athens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roland Martin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ebbe Hertzberg[edit]

You asked for a history-merge Ebbe Carsten Hornemann Hertzberg to Ebbe Hertzberg (asked for by {{db-histmerge}}), but page Ebbe Carsten Hornemann Hertzberg has never existed: see All pages with titles containing Hertzberg and All pages with titles containing Herzberg and Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen#Queried requests. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:27, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know! Now the request is correct. Fernbom2 (talk) 12:46, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]