User talk:Ficzere21

March 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Big Time Rush (band) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Big Time Rush (band) was changed by Ficzere21 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.87671 on 2017-03-12T21:44:10+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:44, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Big Time Rush (band)

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Big Time Rush (band)), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! L3X1 (distant write) 22:01, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm Bennv3771. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on One Direction, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Bennv3771 (talk) 04:43, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Wiggles

Hello Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anthony Field. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Also for Emma,Simon and Lachy Jena (talk) 23:21, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Anthony Field.

July 2017

Hello, I'm Eggishorn. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jonas Brothers, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 13:20, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ficzere21. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ficzere21. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Bongo drum, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 17:18, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am only trying to get as much Information on the article Bongo Drum. Aticles as Conga, or Timbales are less basic information or more of the basic information as I added to Bongo Drum today. This is not my own information. I am simply comping other information from other websites and pasting it into this article. This is because this article has less infor then some or most other instrument articles. Please keep this edit I made I am the biggest article of Bongos and what there lots out there for Bongs as I care for, which I care most for.

Please, Please, Please on my hands and knees. Ficzere21 (talk) 22:00, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been violating the hard policy WP:No original research. Articles on Wikipedia are not expanded by people sharing their experiences. Instead, articles are expanded by people reading published information about the topic and then summarizing that information in the article. The information must come from WP:Reliable sources, not just any blog or self-published website. The source must be cited because Wikipedia requires WP:Verifiability.

Also, you have often added things which don't help the paragraphs flow logically.

Hope that helps. Binksternet (talk) 23:29, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you added more info on Bongo Article if you do not like this edit I am about to make now please. Ficzere21 (talk) 23:56, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Article I am keep editing is not a very strong article, and it upset me. You have so music infor to offer on other drum article as Dejambe or Snare Drum please I am begging you. I never editing this or any article again if you make this article Bongo Drum as you have with you djembe article. Ficzere21 (talk) 01:01, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do not want to make anyone here at Wikipedia angry. I use you and Google most for information on everything I need information for. In school when I made to due a research project is was most hand difficult when I could not use Wikipedia to get information because it has most of everything so need at not being hard to find. Ficzere21 (talk) 01:16, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Bongo drum. Binksternet (talk) 21:22, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I only doing this with Bongo Drum Article, never on any other article ever again will you see this keep this article with the additional info I added. I will keep saying it as much as I have too please in desperate for Bongs to be recognise as a popular instrument. I love Bongo Drums I put as a Perfonsional with no job that as a musician. Ficzere21 (talk) 21:43, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Add more info to the Bongo Drum Article please I am begging You. Ficzere21 (talk) 21:47, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You need to find some WP:Reliable sources to read. After you read them, you can summarize them and cite them. You must stop adding stuff from your own experience. Binksternet (talk) 22:02, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bongo Article

Please add the same amount of information to the Bongo Article that other drum Articles have please.

Removing citations

I won't template you, but I need to warn you that doing edits such as this is disruptive. Citations are vital to the article existence, otherwise we will delete the article (for the lack of citations) and you won't be able to read about your favorite drums ever again. Is that clear?--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 16:56, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I can be ok with this Article getting delayed, if the edited version I have can not stay. This is only because what I started to edit this article it was not ,such of am article. This is being compared to other Drum Articles. I respect Wikipedia and it's information and if you do not want the edited version of this article please then delete it as you said you would. Please and thank you in all respect. Ficzere21 (talk) 17:06, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also I'm to never re-edit this article if you keep edited that I have of this article with h most off all my edits are similar or a repost of a edit you removed. All I want is more info on this article, not to change anything you have done with this Article. The info stays in this article as long as it makes sense with added stuff I put. I am putting added material from other known sources not my own knowledge, some thro is made minor edits to fit inside of this article but keep similar to the original. Please do not re-place this with a less version of this or get rid of it. Bongo Drums do not seem to get enough intention in this world, this gets to me badly. Ficzere21 (talk) 17:18, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That is why we need to add citations and not removing them. The more the better, not the less.--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 18:12, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Ficzere21 reported by User:Why? I Ask (Result: ). Thank you. Why? I Ask (talk) 20:09, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Neodop (talk) 23:43, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Bongo drum. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 02:06, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have increased your block to indefinite for block evasion with Special:contributions/2600:1017:B12F:1FD0:0:45:91A1:1301 and Special:contributions/72.231.224.127.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:04, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]