User talk:Fififolle

Hey Fi, welcome to Wikipedia. I am going to emply you to work on all the Stargate Atlantis articles you know :p Your doomed, doomed I say, dooooooooooooooomed!(Million_Moments 21:07, 18 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Fi! Wikipedia neeeeeeeeeeeds you to correct my spelling!(Million_Moments 16:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Fififolle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Cole

Looked over your aticals and you did great. I added a picture for you on Sergeant Cole. The only comment I could make is you might want to use the full name of pages as wiki links so often. Instead of Michael Kenmore (Stargate Atlantis) always use where possible Michael Kenmore. It looks better on the page. You'll soon be as addicted to editing wikipedia as I am. I'll have to at cons taking pictures so we can release them into the public domain lol :) Happy editing! Million_Moments 15:50, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Ryan Robbins and Erin Chambers pictures have been uploaded with you as the creator and holder of the liscence which says you allow your work to be used for pretty much anything that won't make a profit. Already added to the articles! Million_Moments 21:53, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so proud of you, adding the Torri picture by yourself. *sniffs and wipes away tears of joy*. Million_Moments (talk) 23:19, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Torri collectormania 2007 fififolle.jpg

Hi did you take this pic?Genisock2 (talk) 00:48, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did. Collectormania was a lot of fun. Torri was posing with a fan and I snapped her then. Fififolle (talk)

Thankyou for letting me know.Genisock2 (talk) 18:28, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiprojects

I think its time you joined some wikiprojects. My main suggestions would be Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers since it's actors biographies you mainly work on! Million_Moments (talk) 10:06, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the hint :D (uses your userpage to figure out how to make mine better ;) ) Fififolle (talk) 22:13, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons

When you move an image to commons, you have to tage the image on wikipedia with the following {{subst:ncd|image name on commons.ext}} so that it can then be deleted off the wikipedia servers. Yes, I am still following your edits around :p. Million_Moments (talk) 18:49, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded a Dean pic, then remembered about Commons, so I uploaded one to Commons. So... the pic at Dean Marshall is a commons pic, does it need tagged? *is confused, thanks for help!* Fififolle (talk) 13:19, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I see. If you have an image on wikipedia, and the same one on commons, then you take the one thats on wikipedia with {{subst:ncd|image name on commons.ext}}. No need to do anything with the one from commons cause it's in the right place. Million_Moments (talk) 20:36, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stargate article

*looses it and quits working on all stargate articles*Million_Moments (talk) 14:54, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

*hugs* Fififolle (talk) 18:17, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sgt cole.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sgt cole.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:35, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User subpages

Please do not edit any subpages of User:RussBot. --Russ (talk) 18:25, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will bear that in mind. Have I made any errors whilst fixing disambiguations, or do you have any useful tips for me? Thanks Fififolle (talk) 19:44, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Stargate

Hello, Fififolle! Your username, as well as the usernames of other members of Wikipedia: WikiProject Stargate, has been moved to the inactive members list, as part of a process for update the activity of the wikiproject. If you would like to continue to be an active member, please follow the instructions on the top of the participants page to add your name to the active participants list.

Thanks! – sgeureka ^t•c 16:38, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Fififolle (talk) 22:19, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please Do Not Write Stuff About Me On My User Page Even If It's Correcting Something

Please do ont write things on my user page as you do not know me thanks... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rubzie Biggz 13 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did not write anything about you. I was correcting a disambiguation. Fififolle (talk) 08:59, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maternity (play) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maternity (play) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maternity (play) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mtking (talk) 06:54, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Bamford (stunt coordinator) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Bamford (stunt coordinator) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Bamford (stunt coordinator) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:42, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Bamford (stunt coordinator), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Jacox for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Jacox is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Jacox until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:04, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Fififolle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stunts Canada for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stunts Canada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stunts Canada until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TimothyJosephWood 13:21, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Fififolle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ivon Bartok for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ivon Bartok is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivon Bartok until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 17:07, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anna's Storm for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anna's Storm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna's Storm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 23:15, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello, I'm ResolutionsPerMinute. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Cry for Help, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 22:42, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]