User talk:Filmlegend

Welcome!

Hello, Filmlegend, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Breathing Port Robinson, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Nuttah (talk) 18:51, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Breathing Port Robinson[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Breathing Port Robinson, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non notable - no evidence of coverage in independent reliable sources

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nuttah (talk) 18:51, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to Breathing Port Robinson[edit]

Nuttah,

I appreciate you working hard on making sure articles are "legit" on Wikipedia. However, I do feel your "proposed that this article be deleted" in regards to Breathing Port Robinson, was a bit of a "jumping the gun" don't you think? lol.

If you clearly did your research, Breathing Port Robinson is an actual motion picture currently making the festival circuit as we speak. Links to IMDB, Documentary films.net, the official Breathing Port Robinson website, as well as an article from the Niagara This Week Newspaper are clearly marked on the Wikipedia page.

Now, having said that, are these enough independent sources according to Wikipedia, well, maybe not. But does that mean the article should be deleted with in the next 7 days if it's not improved on? Of course not! There is enough evidence and independent sources there to indeed show, that the film is real and does exist. Don't you think a "Help Wikipedia expand this article" etc.. would have been a more appropriate tag? The proposed deletion of this article is ridiculous. Editing is not about proposing deletion, it's about improving...

The guidelines and criteria for film notability can be found at Wikipedia:Notability (films). As it stands, I see no evidence on how this film meets those. As to 'does that mean the article should be deleted with in the next 7 days if it's not improved on' - Wikipedia policy is clear, articles get deleted until the evidence is there. Nuttah (talk) 19:37, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Breathing Port Robinson[edit]

I have nominated Breathing Port Robinson, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breathing Port Robinson. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Nuttah (talk) 20:07, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]