User talk:FilouPoly

This is FilouPoly's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Philippe Thalmann (February 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by The Herald were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Multiple unreferenced content, especially current activities section. Needs rewrite and cleanup.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Philippe Thalmann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FilouPoly! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mêmes causes et mêmes effets[edit]

Bonjour,

(je me permets d'écrire en français car je soupçonne que vous êtes PT). Concernant la soumission que vous venez de refaire pour l'article vous concernant, la barre qui permet son intégration au corpus encyclopédique (ou pas) se situe au niveau de la notoriété du sujet. En gros est-ce que quelqu'un qui ne vous est pas lié, et réputé comme une source fiable (en règle générale un journal ou magazine) décrit des éléments biographiques vous concernant. Vos publications sont intéressantes (en tout cas je l'espère) mais elles ne disent rien de vous en tant que personne. Or, il s'agit d'écrire une biographie (et non pas de présenter votre bibliographie).

Ce n'est pas forcément évident d'avoir votre portrait dans Le Temps ou la HBR, mais c'est un peu ce genre de matériel qu'il faut viser.

Cordialement, Superboilles (talk) 08:57, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Philippe Thalmann (February 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Subject looks potentially notable, but at a minimum the "Current activities" section needs to be removed due to how promotional it is.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Philippe Thalmann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 01:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]