User talk:Fireman452

I fixed your image problem, on the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brenner_v._Scott&diff=636852490&oldid=636828809 page.

As I said in editorial comments, just cuz I'm one of those who oppose 'Gay Marriage' (or any other type besides traditional marriage) doesn't mean that we hate you or want to mistreat you: gay people are important in God's eyesight too.96.59.130.176 (talk) 06:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE:

I see you were able to fix information typos in my previous edit, where I placed the photo; I am sorry if I made some typos, but I was just copying & pasting from wherever and trying to get your photo posted. Good job: I am glad that we could team up and get these things fixed and updated.96.59.172.254 (talk) 22:01, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts, feedback? Judge Hinkle is losing it...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Brenner_v._Scott#Judge_Hinkle_is_losing_it..._.28commentary.29 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.59.130.9 (talk) 05:20, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do not feel qualified to editorialize concerning Judge Hinkle's abilities. I believe that he has shown himself to be very capable throughout these proceedings. As to the Sevier issue, I personally saw the document where he forged our Atty's signature - so when it comes to that I KNOW this happened based on personal experience. Sevier has demonstrated that he is an unhinged individual, and as a result the TN State Supreme Court has relieved him of his license to practice law until he is able to demonstrate that he once again is mentally stable, or at least stable enough to carry on a sensible conversation. His stalking, and other extraordinary activities make one wonder if this will ever be possible.

Talk:Brenner v. Scott#Assessment

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Brenner v. Scott#Assessment. Article assessed to B-Class per your request Thanks. Gmcbjames (talk) 05:30, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]