User talk:Fixtherecord

Dennis L. Montgomery[edit]

I have responded to your comment at Talk:Dennis L. Montgomery. Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:07, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dennis L. Montgomery has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dennis L. Montgomery was changed by Fixtherecord (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.904281 on 2016-03-18T01:48:58+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:49, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dennis L. Montgomery with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ueutyi (talk) 01:52, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SarrCat ∑;3 02:38, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Dennis L. Montgomery with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:58, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. —BarrelProof (talk) 04:05, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Dennis L. Montgomery[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Fixtherecord reported by User:BarrelProof (Result: Blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:12, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That report has been moved. It is now available at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive310#User:Fixtherecord reported by User:BarrelProof (Result: Blocked). Thank you. —BarrelProof (talk) 22:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that the same edit warring behavior resumed once the block expired. That is really not helpful or constructive, and seems likely to result in being blocked again. I suggest to engage the community in some constructive discussion at Talk:Dennis L. Montgomery rather than just continuing to repeatedly try to blank the article. —BarrelProof (talk) 22:47, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fixtherecord. Please discuss your concerns. You do not believe that National Public Radio is a reliable source? What about U.S. News & World Report? If you don't explain why you are removing this material from the article, you may be indefinitely blocked from editing. EdJohnston (talk) 22:59, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:35, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]