User talk:FlameMoth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For further explanation of my 'removal' of accent, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice hockey. -- GoodDay (talk) 20:46, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More specifically, Wikipedia has had a long running string of disputes over whether or not to use diacritics and accent marks, mainly on the basis of the fact that North American English rarely uses them. After considerable debate, the project settled on the compromise that they would be hidden, per North American English standards, on articles related to North American teams and leagues, but would be shown on player articles and articles related to European teams and leagues. This effectively is based around the WP:ENGVAR guideline. Since the Canadiens roster template is focused around two North American team articles, we hope that you will respect this compromise and leave the accents off. Cheers, Resolute 23:08, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding minor league free agents[edit]

All of the info that I added came directly from an NHL source not a minor league so that is why I added it the way I did. I see you are referring to the Canadiens? Here is the reasoning why I put the info in as I did: Andrew Conboy never played a NHL game with the Canadiens but is listed here from the official list from NHL of free agents as a free agent of the Canadiens. He is sourced here that he was signed by the Canadiens in March 2009 to a three year contract and assigned to the AHL. Therefor he was signed by the Canadiens, not the AHL affiliate and would be listed as a free agent at the NHL level. An example player who would only be listed in the AHL roster as a free agent would be Kyle Hagel since he signed his contract directly with the Hamilton Bulldogs. All of the players listed in the NHL team's roster as a free agent were signed directly by the NHL team not the affiliate team and are free agents on the NHL level. As for the comment of the list being incomplete because every player under contract of a team is not listed none of the sources listed have that information so they are complete per the sources which consists with WP:INTEGRITY policy. -♣ B2project ♣ 21:56, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FlameMoth. You have new messages at B2project's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

July 2016[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Template:Montreal Canadiens roster, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 00:55, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Callmemirela. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Template:Montreal Canadiens roster, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 00:55, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Montreal Canadiens roster[edit]

[1] The only reason why he was being removed was because he was not the roster. When I checked this morning, he was still not added. You had not provided a source then. Please read WP:BURDEN, WP:V, WP:OR and WP:SPECULATION the next time you add a player. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 18:34, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 21:06, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

[2] It wasn't when I made the edit. Please, as I have said before, wait until written in the source before jumping on the gun on adding players. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 21:21, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Callmemirela: I will make sure the pages are accurate. FlameMoth (talk) 21:26, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Another solution would be to add another source next to the main one for the time being and when the primary source has updated, you can remove the secondary source. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 21:27, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]