User talk:Flamefirewate

August 2023[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Talk:Tower of Babel, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 10:26, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Tower of Babel, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 18:59, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tower of Babel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Renewal6 (talk) 19:09, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tower of Babel. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. StephenMacky1 (talk) 19:21, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:38, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do have good sources I have the book of Genesis and the Tower of Babel is not a myth Flamefirewate (talk) 19:47, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do have good sources I have the book of Genesis and the Tower of Babel is not a myth Flamefirewate (talk) 20:08, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You should get familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. On here, things have to be analyzed critically and objectively, religious things not excluded. For starters, check WP:NOTADVOCACY, WP:RS and WP:RNPOV. For now, take a break and if you ever try to return, ensure that you are constructive. StephenMacky1 (talk) 20:30, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why I should be unblocked[edit]

I did have good sources I have the book of Genesis and the Tower of Babel is not a myth Flamefirewate (talk) 20:24, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Unblock reason)[edit]

I should be unblocked because I did have good sources I have the book of Genesis and The Tower of Babel is not a myth Flamefirewate (talk) 04:53, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]