User talk:Flatmax

Check out Project jumbled Project dynamic. Two of my attempts to get cheap digital pitch cueing on regular computer hardware.

Also check out my new album at flatmax studios

RE : project dynamic

Hi, existence does not equate justification for the article to exist. What Wikipedia is looking out for is notability through verifiability through reliable, secondary third-party sources. In other words, your product will need to be well-covered by the media (e.g. PC World, The New York Times) or some respectable publication to be able to meet standards for inclusion on Wikipedia. If you do have that, please feel free to re-create the article including such sources. Hope that answer your queries. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 14:50, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Project jumbled

A tag has been placed on Project jumbled, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Millbrooky (talk) 22:31, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Kiezowa Jolino

A tag has been placed on Kiezowa Jolino requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Millbrooky (talk) 22:32, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vector graphic synth

The article Vector graphic synth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kkmurray (talk) 21:49, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear computation

Hi, thanks for suggesting this topic as a Wikipedia article. However, you have omitted to provide any citations, so the article as it now stands provides no evidence that the topic is notable as understood in Wikipedia policy. If you want the article not to face a deletion discussion, now is your opportunity to add the sources you have been using to demonstrate that it is worth keeping. Please read the policy on verifiability if you have any doubts about why sources are essential: it is not enough to rely on your own knowledge of the topic. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:29, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the first few citations. Every section should be cited, and it's far better to add the references as you go along - trying to backfill them later is error-prone, and passages are liable to be deleted as uncited or "original research". All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:59, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]