User talk:Flexdevelopers999
Blocked
[edit] | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. |
Yamla (talk) 17:35, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
{unblock|Hello. I am not sure why I am blocked. This is the first time I am trying to create this page. Can you kindly review the content of it qualifies?}} Flexdevelopers999 (talk) 17:39, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I blocked you due to your abuse of multiple accounts (WP:SOCK). You are making exactly the same edits as the banned users, Anusmartmirror and Hubbakhan1983 and Khan2004kashf. You'll need to explain exactly and specifically why you are targeting the same article with the same edits as these banned users. --Yamla (talk) 17:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- I am not sure who they are. I just saw this movie, heard about her, know that she is well known here but could not find a Wikipedia page. I researched details on her and strongly believe she deserves and article on Wikipedia so that people don't have to go around looking for details about her. I believe I have put in good references from renowned newspaper in India and it should hopefully help. Flexdevelopers999 (talk) 17:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- If you aren't going to tell the truth, there's no point continuing this conversation. Your draft was word for word identical to various sections of the prior accounts' contributions. That wasn't a coincidence. --Yamla (talk) 17:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- I am telling the truth. The filmography and achievements could obviously be the same as it is about the same person I guess. But I have cited sources and references that I have researched. I request you to kindly let look at the content and let me know if it qualifies for an article or not. I am an avid Wikipedia reader and follower and I believe others shouldn't have the need to search details about her like I had to. Hence, I kindly request you to review. Flexdevelopers999 (talk) 18:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- WORD FOR WORD IDENTICAL. As you are unwilling to be honest, I will not respond further. --Yamla (talk) 18:02, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- I am telling the truth. Can you share the previous documents also so that I can see how they can be possibly word for word same? If they were to be word for word same, why would one even try to resubmit it? Flexdevelopers999 (talk) 18:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Most of us try and copy the format of existing articles of similar personality and change the content based on our research and knowledge. Hence, I agree that format might be similar but it cannot be same word to word Flexdevelopers999 (talk) 18:08, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- I am telling the truth. Can you share the previous documents also so that I can see how they can be possibly word for word same? If they were to be word for word same, why would one even try to resubmit it? Flexdevelopers999 (talk) 18:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- WORD FOR WORD IDENTICAL. As you are unwilling to be honest, I will not respond further. --Yamla (talk) 18:02, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- I am telling the truth. The filmography and achievements could obviously be the same as it is about the same person I guess. But I have cited sources and references that I have researched. I request you to kindly let look at the content and let me know if it qualifies for an article or not. I am an avid Wikipedia reader and follower and I believe others shouldn't have the need to search details about her like I had to. Hence, I kindly request you to review. Flexdevelopers999 (talk) 18:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- If you aren't going to tell the truth, there's no point continuing this conversation. Your draft was word for word identical to various sections of the prior accounts' contributions. That wasn't a coincidence. --Yamla (talk) 17:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Flexdevelopers999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your reason here I believe I am an innocent who is having to face the collateral damage of someone else's violations. Please help
Decline reason:
I agree with Yamla's analysis. Minor word substitutions have been made, but this account's contributions and those of the other accounts are sufficiently identical that it would be considered plagiarism. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 19:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.