User talk:FloK

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Image copyright problem with Image:Blank line in "hidden" template.JPG[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Blank line in "hidden" template.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Klaus Mehnert[edit]

Hi! You have reverted the bibliography section I had added and replaced it with your own version, which is not much more comprehensive than the previous. Would you please explain what was the reason. Thanks. CeeGee (talk) 19:12, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FloK. I do agree with you that an article should include both pros and cons on a subject matter. However, Wikipedia is not a place for people to document a list of bugs in a software, unless it has significant coverage which justifies it's notability in the article. For notability to exist, this usually requires reliable secondary sources. The reason I reverted your edit is because (1) forums and newsgroups are not considered reliable secondary sources, and (2) the issue does not have enough significant coverage for it to be considered notable. --Damaster98 (talk) 13:17, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your contribution to this page and wanted to say thank you for your help and efforts. -Ich (talk) 21:11, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]