User talk:Flobot222

But during the world wars, Hitler started his conjuring up of COMPLETELY FALSE, made up crap about how blonde haired people are superior by evolution (which is proven false). Hitler said stuff like, blondes have smaller and sharper mouths just like birds so that they can sing better. He also altered and vandalized the great philosopher Nietzsche's book to say ridiculous things about germans being superior.

Now, he was going through eugenics and was creating a hierarchy of superiority by race as most know (for example slavs are in the middle, jews are absolutely last, blacks were considered half-human).

During the period, he had relations with the ruler of Persia (iran's REAL NAME) at the time, Reza Shah. Read about Reza Shah; this guy denied to remove german troops from his soil even though allies told him twice to do it; if you read books more extensively, he did many other pro-hitler things.

Evidence shows he wanted to align with hitler.

This SAME GUY also CHANGED Persia's name to IRAN because Hitler said he would put persians on a higher racial status if Reza Shah can make an image of Persians having an 'Aryan history' and mixed Aryan blood; this made up false information would give hitler a reason to publicly side with the NON-WHITE persians and at the same time not with any of the other non-white peoples in arab countries and india.

So Reza Shah CHANGED the name of Persia to Iran.

Afterwards though, the allies invaded Persia and Reza Shah was stripped of power. Now, all of this leads to the ridiculously messy situation in present day where aryan is a term tossed around as originating from 5 different countries and 4 liguistic lines and possible racial lines and bologna.

I don't have time to cite the world war and historical books of iran and india which give this information. You have to read a plethora of books to accumulate and cite this information, so my apologies for that.

Persians were influenced by ancient Vedic (hindu) Indians to start using the term aryan.

Research shows persians started using aryan around 500bce, and Indians have been using it from 3000bce to 2000bce.

Also, ancient India controlled afghanistan, pakistan, tibet, nepal, sri lanka, bangladesh,

ANI notice[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.. --Saddhiyama (talk) 09:06, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jemima Khan. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:44, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3RR notice[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Flobot222_reported_by_User:Andy_Dingley_.28Result:_.29 regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:04, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Flobot222, contains the suffix "-bot", which is generally reserved for authorized bot accounts.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Wifione _.......^{Leave a message} 11:51, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additional note[edit]

Dear Flobot222, given the fact that your block coincides with an edit warring report that I notice, I should re-mention that your username block has no connection with any editorial issue other editors might have at this moment. I encourage you to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then simply follow the process that is given above. In case you need any help or clarification, please feel completely free to email me directly and I'll respond to your email at the earliest possible. Again, my apologies for the inconvenience this block may be causing your regular editing. Let this not deter you from contributing positively to Wikipedia in the future. My best regards. Wifione _.......^{Leave a message} 13:45, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]