User talk:FlorentPirot

February 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to High-explosive_anti-tank_warhead. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=High-explosive_anti-tank_warhead&diff=prev&oldid=647430742

This is repeated, unsourced nonsensical crap. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:29, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sverlovsk45 Nuclear Test

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Sverlovsk45 Nuclear Test, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Syrian Scientific Studies and Research Center. Please read WP:RS and WP:V Andy Dingley (talk) 20:14, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Andy Dingley (talk) 11:55, 25 March 2015 (UTC) I have used conditionnality in my new edits. I have clearly stated these are accusations. Shouldn't an encyclopedia make mention of accusations that have been made on this subject ? Please take a second look, I feel injustly censored. --FlorentPirot (talk) 14:12, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're not unjustly censored because by strict WP policy you (as an editor) have no voice here. Please see WP:OR (what you're doing) and WP:RS & WP:V (how we actually work), Andy Dingley (talk) 15:02, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Depleted uranium. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 19:35, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Depleted uranium, you may be blocked from editing. VQuakr (talk) 20:54, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Depleted uranium. VQuakr (talk) 22:00, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Shaped charge. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shaped_charge&diff=746967882&oldid=745965873

Yet again, you are using WP as a personal WP:SOAPBOX to insert unsourced, and simply incorrect personal views, simply to push your own agenda. An agenda which although I'm sympathetic to in principle, you clearly don't even have the technical knowledge to express correctly. WP is not the place for this. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:22, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Depleted uranium. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. VQuakr (talk) 23:36, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My intention has never been to do search engine optimization, I just want to inform the public on my findings, as this is the purpose of the association I am the secretary of. Will copy paste articles instead in the future in talk pages. Best regards,FlorentPirot (talk) 21:27, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are missing the point. Whether or not the goal is SEO, you need to avoid edits that promote your website and also avoid a pattern of edits that indicates that you are here to promote a viewpoint. Informing the public of your findings is not something that you are welcome to do here. VQuakr (talk) 18:27, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]