User talk:FlowerFaerie087

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! FlowerFaerie087, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 07:24, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative[edit]

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi FlowerFaerie087! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel

Feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 07:24, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Symbol (chemistry), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amyl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Actinidine biosynthesis image[edit]

Hi FlowerFaerie087,

In this edit, you said "Gif didn't work" and deleted the Biosynthesis section content related to it. The image was working for me (generally speaking) but it was being displayed below the infobox rather than in the section itself. I revived the section and fixed that layout problem. You also noted some content problems, but I am not sure if the section you deleted was hopeless on those grounds. Please check back and let me know if there are other image problems. No prejudice against re-removing the whole section if it really is unsalvageable in terms of actual content. DMacks (talk) 09:11, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]