Jump to content

User talk:Fluorinated tears burn my eyes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not seeing how the ref supports

[edit]

"Home care in the United Kingdom exists in a state of disarray as various private firms compete for government contracts in a race to the bottom which often results in elderly and vulnerable people being denied the care they are entitled to. The crisis has speed to hospital wards where sick, elderly patients who would usually receive care either at home or in specialist care homes, take up hospital beds whilst recovering from minor ailments such as colds and flu, meaning that less beds and services are available for emergencies. Furthur backlogs of patients occur because elderly patients cannot be discharged into care at home until adequate provisions have been made, however as home care is largely handled by health care businesses such as Richard Branson's Virgin Care, there is little incentive to help those who lack the funds to pay for private health care.[1] "

?Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:22, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Walker, Peter; Stewart, Heather (2018-03-12). "NHS faces year-round crisis over lack of social care, says council chief". the Guardian. Retrieved 2018-07-06.

Fluorinated tears burn my eyes, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Fluorinated tears burn my eyes! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Tagging

[edit]

I noticed some of your tag additions have been blatantly incorrect. E.g. {{notability}} on nation at the Asian games articles? It looks to me you're just randomly adding tags, as pointed out by Doc James above. Please cut it out. The editor whose username is Z0 09:07, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I saw your message on my talk page. You can also reply here if you want. Why do you think Andrew Bayer may not be notable (as you've added the notability tag)? He has been nominated for a Grammy award and has multiple albums on charts. There are numerous sources. The editor whose username is Z0 09:27, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I can see there are alot of sources. However 1.Most of them link directly to primary sources such as I-tunes and beat port buy pages (an activity which could significantly hyper inflate the artist's google rankings) 2. A lot of your sources, for example the Billboard source are profiles which can and have been created by the artist themselves, again this is a primary source.

3. I think more telling is what references aren't there. There is no mention of the artist in mainstream EDM publications such as mix mag, Thump, Pitchfork, XLR8R etc. Why? Because the artist lacks notability.

If I am wrong though I am willing to accept it and move on.Fluorinated tears burn my eyes (talk) 09:45, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. Per the Wikipedia notability policy, a subject merits an article if it passes the general notability criteria (GNG) and/or the subject-specific criteria (SSG). The GNG requires that there exist multiple sources that discuss the subject significantly are reliable and independent from the subject. There exists multiple sources that satisfy the above requirement such as AllMusic[1], Dancing Astronaut[2], Insomniac[3], thus passing the GNG. Andrew Bayer has also multiple albums on national music chart(s), thus passing the SSG - which is WP:NMUSIC for musicians. He has also been nominated for a Grammy award, hence adding more weight to his notability. Primary sources in the article do not affect this person's notability as long as it's already established. The publications you mentioned (MixMag, Thump, etc) are reliable but just because they have not wrote about this person doesn't mean other reliable sources don't count. Please let me know if you still disagree. Regards. The editor whose username is Z0 09:57, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Z0: Hello! How can I appeal to the sysops with a complaint against this participant? He is clearly a Troll and vandalisim article.--Pavliukdanila (talk) 10:03, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not call a good faith editor a vandal as it is against the no personal attacks policy. The editor whose username is Z0 10:11, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Wikipedia is not a tool for fun, articles are written here. If you do that again, I'll go to the sysops.--Pavliukdanila (talk) 09:54, 10 July 2018 (UTC)#[reply]

Sorry mate, but how are English speaking editors supposed to determine notability is all the references are in another language? It is my understanding that when quoting from a non-English source one must translate the title or use an English alternative where one is available.Fluorinated tears burn my eyes (talk) 10:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No. Many people use the name in Russian, because it is the name. It is impossible to translate the name, as it will be an original research. Example of other articles: [4], [5], [6], [7].--Pavliukdanila (talk) 10:17, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So please do not do that anymore, okay? References can be in any language. --Pavliukdanila (talk) 10:25, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Fluorinated tears burn my eyes! You created a thread called Reference Language at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]