User talk:Flyndfoster

June 2020[edit]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it appears to impersonate another Wikipedia user. Users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, nor is other disruptive behavior ever allowed. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. For best results, please read the guide to appealing blocks first. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:44, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Flyndfoster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this is to tell u that I have not impersonated anybody and that I am a old editor with username = princeanand2003@gmail.com but due to my account getting hacked and none of the recovery procedures working.... I had to make another account with name flynfoster and you may be mistakenly considering me @@flyindfotberserk.. so kindly unblock me as I have many things to edit and is not free for such mistakes Flyndfoster (talk) 16:23, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's difficult to understand your message. Please list all the accounts that you have previously used, and use proper English grammar. Also, please make a clear statement about whether this account is related to User:Fylindfotberserk in some way. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:47, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Flyndfoster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not impersonated anybody and this is my one and only account and no I don't have any type of relation with user:flyindfotberserk and you may be confused as our usernames look alike. Again, I don't have any relation with @flyindfotberserk and is the owner of only this account so pls unblock me as I have many more stuff to edit and is a very reliable editor Thank youFlyndfoster (talk) 20:27, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've made 8 edits to articles and another two to article talk pages. In that group of 10 edits, five of them were to articles edited by Fylindfotberserk. I therefore find the claim this is a coincidence hard to believe. Not impossible, certainly, but hard. Compare the overlap in edits between your account and mine. There are none (at least, until I post this). And I have more edits than Fylindfotberserk. Pick a new username. Yamla (talk) 21:44, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Having somewhat similar username is just a coincidence and I don't think I should be blocked regarding that Flyndfoster (talk) 20:29, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In this post, you indicated "I have tried all the recovery procedures....but they didn't work and that's why I had to start from scratch....so pls allow me to edit the page as I am a reliable editor and not a troll ...if u need any proof ask my wikipedia friend like @flyindfotberserk". So clearly you know who Fylindfotberserk is, and your name is inexplicably similar, despite the fact that you misspelled Fylind's name "Flyind" and this new account is "Flynd". Sorry, the similarities seem too great.

You've only made eight edits to articles. Why don't you: Create a new account with a Prince Anand-style name so that your online friends will recognise you, then declare on that new user page that you previously used the other account, so that nobody erroneously suspects you of violating our sockpuppetry policy? That would seem the easiest thing to do. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:46, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Flyndfoster (talk) 05:06, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But I guess you have blocked my account which means you have also blacked my ip address and so u have to lift the black in order for me to change the username or make another account Flyndfoster (talk) 05:13, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Flyndfoster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Eyeopener (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I would like to change my username from flyndfoster to eye opener as advised by Cyphoidbomb so that my account be easily distinguishable from other accounts and so that I don't get such problems in future and can easily edit pages on my own.

Decline reason:

The account already exists and is blocked. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 09:36, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flyndfoster (talk) 08:32, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't address your obviously false claim that you picked this name with no idea about Fylindfotberserk (apart from the username, see here). You also need to indicate what previous account or accounts you have used. You gave an email address but not an account name. Note if that previous account is blocked, there's probably nothing to be done here, as you'd be violating WP:EVADE and WP:SOCK. Note, now is the time to be completely honest because you won't get another chance. --Yamla (talk) 12:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, it looks most likely that your previous accounts were PrinceAnand2003 and Ptinceanend2003. Although you worked hard to actively mislead us there and although your edits were generally abusive, the PrinceAnand2003 account was in good standing at the time you stopped using it. Therefore, this is not a case of WP:EVADE. --Yamla (talk) 12:14, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]