User talk:Fnr Kllrb

Roma people

Please stop to scramble the article. Your edits are not supported by the discussion in the talk page. --Olahus (talk) 09:42, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Fnr Kllrb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Beeblebrox (talk) 09:45, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Roma people. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Molotron 03:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Roma people, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Molotron 19:02, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. -- Molotron 12:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Three revert rule

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- Molotron 12:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do review the three-revert rule. You've presently made 4 reverts from 11:48, 17 November 2008 to 11:38, 18 November 2008, which is in breach of this policy. Thank you. -- Molotron 12:15, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for engaging in an edit war. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. MBisanz ^talk 13:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And again, 48h, edit warring and incivility [1] William M. Connolley (talk) 13:13, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Turkic vs. Turkic-speaking

Hi, Fnr Kllrb. I'm unclear why this is considered an issue worth edit-warring over, but I do know that the cited source uses the term "Turkic-speaking". Altering the text without citing a different source is falsifying the citation and amounts to vandalism. Can you explain? I have also posted this question at Talk:Tatars and would encourage you to join the conversation there at some point. Regards, Kafka Liz (talk) 16:09, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tatars. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Kafka Liz (talk) 14:32, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for engaging in an edit war. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

–Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 17:53, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Fnr Kllrb. Thank you. Kafka Liz (talk) 11:34, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]