User talk:Football123213

I have tagged your article Top 100 Greatest Guitar Players of all Time for early deletion. This is because , while incontrovertibly your list contains the names of many great guitar players, a statement as to which are the best is clearly your personal point of view. Please see WP:POV.--Anthony.bradbury 00:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HLGuard

HLGuard has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt the subject might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 20:36, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As you removed the template, I decided to AFD it. Please give your input to the debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HLGuard. Bjelleklang - talk 07:01, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove AFD messages. If you disagree, please raise the issue at this page: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HLGuard. Bjelleklang - talk 04:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --Kukini 04:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the removal of a semi-protect tag

Please do not remove the tag that notifies editors that the article is semi-protected, such as you did with World of Warcraft, as the article is still protected according the page's logs. While you may understand that the article cannot be edited by anonymous editors, those people who do not have an account with Wikipedia are given some choices if they wish to contribute, such as creating one or suggesting the changes on the article's talk page. It may be an eyesore to some, but it does indeed serve a purpose for those who are unable to contribute due to the page's protection.

Additionally, I have noticed that you tend to save edits without an edit summary. Using the little box underneath the source code enables other users to quickly determine what you changes within the page. It doesn't take long to do, perhaps only a few extra seconds. It does not need to be a complete story, only a clear and concise list of things that you changed. For example, if you make an edit to correct some spelling mistakes, you could put "fixed spelling errors" or something to that effect. I wish you a good day, and happy editing. Kyra_~(talk) 04:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Football123213 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

$3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

$2

Blocking administrator: $1 (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Follow the instructions. — Yamla 16:12, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Football123213 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well im lost right now i can edit pages but when i tryed to start a new page i get ($7 (an account, IP address or range of addresses) was blocked by $1 for the following reason (see our blocking policy):) I do not understand what this is. I do not think i have done anything wrong but im just very lost right now on how i get unblocked and every thing Well anyways Thanks.

Decline reason:

Same reason. We can't fix your autoblock without knowing which IP or the like. Help us out by following the instructions at Template:Autoblock. Thanks.— Chaser - T 17:12, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Signing comments

When you add comments to a talk page, please remember to sign your comments using four tildes (~). Thank you. Montgomery' 39 (talk) 22:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]