User talk:FootballCricket

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of LanguageXpert (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —SpacemanSpiff 16:27, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What is this ?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FootballCricket (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why I am blocked? FootballCricket (talk) 16:29, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is explained immediately above your unblock request. Yamla (talk) 16:34, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sorri I don't understand please can you help me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FootballCricket (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorri I don't understand please can you help me. How can I understand and appeal or get any chance to defend the allegations for block? what is the system FootballCricket (talk) 7:11 pm, Today (UTC+2)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:39, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

One unblock request at a time, please. --Yamla (talk) 17:27, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FootballCricket (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To be unblocked, I read that I must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. I guarentee that I will not damage or disrupt. I have made only one edit on a talk page. I have not made any damage or disruption. I will learn the rules and try my best to be good contributor. Please un block me. And guide me what I did wrong and how I can avoid it in future. Expecting some good favour. Please Thank you FootballCricket (talk) 2:23 pm, Yesterday (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

You've been blocked as a sock. Your one edit is close enough to LX that I'm going to decline this block and will revoke talk page access as well. regentspark (comment) 12:31, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser needed Can we compare this editor to LanguageXpert socks? Vanjagenije (talk) 21:21, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The check was Inconclusive. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 22:37, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please update me about my appeal please.I am intrusted to edit Gaelic football.