User talk:Fragga

February 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Freenet, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- a kendall 14:52, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

??? please explain !

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Freenet. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Freenet was changed by Fragga (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.947186 on 2012-02-12T16:50:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:50, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation of the above statements[edit]

I am sorry if the above statements made by the bot is a bit confusing. When you edited the Freenet article, you changed the style of the article by making the subsection headers to bulletin points. This should normally not be done since the style in Wikipedia is to use section headers in subsections and only use bulletin points in lists. You also do not link to websites in the article, except in rare cased where the link greatly enhance the readers ability to reach for more information. You can read more about the style used in Wikipedia in the WP:Manual of Style, and the guide for adding links to external websites in the WP:External links. As for the content in the edits, please be aware of a few things. 1) Encyclopedic content must be [[WP:verifiable|verifiable]. This mean you need to cite sources for any statement done in the article. 2) Encyclopedic text need to be written in a objective from. Opinions like good, bad, popular, and "failed totally" should not be used. In same way, addressing the user like "You have to use a standard email client to use it. No web ui.", should be written like "A standard email client is needed as there is no web ui (cited source here).". 3) spelling is important, so please use a spelling tool and the Show preview button. Belorn (talk) 22:33, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]