User talk:Fredman2323

February 2015

Hello, I'm Orphan Wiki. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Chip (rapper)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Orphan Wiki 17:50, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 21:42, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fredman2323, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Fredman2323! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chip (rapper) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chip (rapper) was changed by Fredman2323 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864287 on 2015-02-16T21:08:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:08, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Chip (rapper)

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Chip (rapper)), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:06, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dwight Gayle. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:33, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Chip (rapper)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Chip (rapper), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! — kikichugirl ^speak up! 20:19, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paul Wellings-Longmore

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Paul Wellings-Longmore requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Everymorning talk 13:47, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Believe and Achieve

Hello Fredman2323,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Believe and Achieve for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ireneshih (talk) 14:43, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's too soon for a standalone article if there isn't even a release date planned. I've redirected it to the artiste's article. Peridon (talk) 15:33, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Wellings-Longmore

Please read WP:BIO about notability, and WP:RS about the reliable independent sources needed to prove it. He may be notable enough for an article, but you have to show it (and prove it). Wikipedia isn't a profile host like LinkedIn. Peridon (talk) 15:37, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, I'm Egghead06. Your recent edit to the page Nile Ranger appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 16:52, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Chip (rapper)

added links pointing to Frisco, JME, Giggs, Devlin and Scorcher

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:06, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. Helpsome (talk) 16:22, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for repeated addition of unsourced data. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 17:24, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Egghead06. Your recent edit to the page Henri Lansbury appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 17:59, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Serge Gnabry. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 21:24, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ryan Mason. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:53, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Fredman2323. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]