User talk:FreedomFighter77

Comments are welcome.

Welcome[edit]

Hello, FreedomFighter77, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Active Banana (^bananaphone 16:24, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page comments[edit]

Hello, when responding to another's comment on a talk page such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot Lap Dance Club, please use a hard return to start your comment on a new line, and then include one or more ":" at the begining of the line prior to your response to indent and clearly separate your comments from the user you are responding to. Thanks! Active Banana (^bananaphone 16:24, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you may be interested in reading our conflict of interest policy. Active Banana (^bananaphone 16:25, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Made changes to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot Lap Dance Club to separate my comments.

Read conflict of interest policy there is no self promoting or conflict of interest involving an entity that is no longer in business.FreedomFighter77 (talk) 17:13, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also the article talk pages such a Talk:Hot Lap Dance Club are for discussions about how to improve the article. If you are worried that a deletion will occur while you are still rounding up reliable sources that will show WP:N has been met, you can create a temporary "sandbox" article in your user space, such as User:FreedomFighter77/HLDC_draft and work on the article there. Active Banana (^bananaphone 20:21, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Noted FreedomFighter77 (talk) 23:29, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Lawline (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

I hate having to block you, but now that you've made it clear that you're User:Lawline, I don't have a choice- you are still involved in that lawsuit against Wikipedia, which means you need to be communicating with Wikipedia through the attorneys, and not on the encyclopedia. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:34, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FreedomFighter77 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I dispute your accusations and know nothing about a lawsuit.

Decline reason:

If you are not Lawline then you are the victim of one of the most staggering coincidences I have ever witnessed. Your account became active just after Lawline was blocked, you edit in exactly the same topic areas, ,make the same type of unhelpful edits, and other astonishingly similar errors that I won't mention in the interest of WP:BEANS Too bad Robert Ripley isn't here today to document this amazing occurrence. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you saying that you are not the same person as User:Lawline, and do not have any personal connection with that person? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:45, 26 January 2011 (UTC) No, i am not lawline and have no conection with lawline. I was just trying to help out editing an article that was poorly sourced.[reply]

Please don't copy the text of WP:RTV here. It exists where it is; copying it is not helpful. Note the section that says, "Sometimes the community will not extend the courtesy: for example, if the user is not actually leaving, or if the user is not in good standing. The right to vanish might not be extended to users who have been abusive or disruptive, who left when they lost the trust of the community, or who have been banned. " -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:46, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]