User talk:FreedomFighter84

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FreedomFighter84 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I AM OBVOIUSLY NOT DEFACTO, I HAVE NO CORRELATION TO DEFACTO, ARE ADMINS REALLY THIS STUPID!?

Decline reason:

It doesn't really matter; you created multiple abusive accounts at the same time, so whether you are defacto or some other abusive editor, you are unwelcome. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 14:20, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Important finding - FYI[edit]

Hello FreedomFighter84, whilst trawling recently, I came across this Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DeFacto/Archive#19 July 2012 discussion which you may be interested in. It tends to suggest that a recent "check user" performed on your account (abbreviated to "FF84" in some of the comment) confirmed that it is unrelated to that of DeFacto. As indeed you confirm yourself in the "appeal" you made above. I'm not sure though why the administrators discovering this did not investigate that fact further. 82.132.249.195 (talk) 06:46, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]