Jump to content

User talk:Frithnow

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/City Gatekeepers, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Frithnow. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "City Gatekeepers".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/City Gatekeepers}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 08:02, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Photographer's Barnstar
Thanks for uploading your images and linking them to the article. If I can enlarge the article enough, further images can be used. Ratel (talk) 07:54, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anning

[edit]

Hey. I understand where you're coming from on that issue, but there are a few problems. First, that's certainly not his occupation, as it's not how he makes his living. Second, there's no universally accepted definition of that, which means it's a subjective term, which means that calling him that falls under our proscription on original research. Please don't restore such phrases to the article until you can support it with citations to reliable sources. Thanks. DS (talk) 21:09, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flash Cycles (April 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Frithnow! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flash Cycles (July 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Cerebellum (talk) 09:32, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Flash Cycles

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Frithnow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Flash Cycles, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]