User talk:Funguy06

This user may have left Wikipedia. Funguy06 has not edited Wikipedia since April 26, 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I have noticed that you link to non-existant pages quite often on talk pages. Please note that links turn blue when linking to an existing page.

For the future, please make sure that the page you wish to link to actually exists by searching for it. If it doesn't, then do one of the following:

Thank you.

Image copyright problem with Image:Loosewomen333.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Loosewomen333.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:23, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Andrea presenter l.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Andrea presenter l.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading.STBotI (talk) 06:40, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your uploads

Good day. I see that you have uploaded a number of images to Wikipedia. First off, thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, there are some guidelines that we need to follow with copyrighted images. Specifically, you need to add a source for the image (a link to a website will do), a copyright tag (there are some listed at WP:ICT), and a rationale explaining why we can use a copyrighted image (explained at WP:NFURG). I see that your images fail to include one of these. Please stop uploading images and address the concerns listed above. If you need assistance, you can ask at the help desk. If you do not fix these images, and you continue to make bad uploads, you will be blocked and your images will be deleted. Thanks for your contributions! STBotI (talk) 06:40, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Gm4tv.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gm4tv.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:45, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Fionaphillips.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fionaphillips.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:48, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Lwset.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lwset.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:03, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tmorningnew.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tmorningnew.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:27, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Thegrahamshow.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Thegrahamshow.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Loose-women-banner.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Loosewomenlogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Loosewomenlogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:24, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Skill Force

A tag has been placed on Skill Force, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:57, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Forgive me (Leona Lewis song)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Forgive me (Leona Lewis song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Dmwiki (talk) 08:40, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the notability threshold for songs before continuing to recreate this article outside your userspace. I'm sure it will make a chart sometime soon, until then, be patient. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 15:46, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

fake protection

Please don't falsely add protection tags to articles, as you did to Right Now (Leon Jackson album) it is pointless and deceptive. Beeblebrox (talk) 07:09, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rightnowleon.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rightnowleon.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Bbcscotlandstudios.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Bbcscotlandstudios.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:42, 18 September 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:42, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Bbcscotlandstudios.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Bbcscotlandstudios.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 10:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Thefamilytitle.jpg

I have tagged Image:Thefamilytitle.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 00:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hot sauce.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Hot sauce.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.

That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
~~Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.~~

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:37, 23 September 2008 (UTC) [reply]

PD-claims

You have uploaded some images which you claim to have "created entirely by yourself". However, their file names indicate to me that they have been taken from elsewhere. Are you able to provide proof, such as uploading higher resolution versions and information about which camera they were photographed with? The JPS ^{talk to me} 16:14, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Stewart Hannah

A tag has been placed on Stewart Hannah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Blowdart | ^talk 19:12, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Stewart Hannah, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Blowdart | ^talk 19:33, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:HOLLYOAKS.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:HOLLYOAKS.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:52, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect intellectual property rights - do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view when editing articles - this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Erik the Red 2 ~~~~ 04:59, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Celebjuice.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Celebjuice.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.

That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
~~Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.~~

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:34, 16 October 2008 (UTC) [reply]

THIS ACCOUNT NEEDS TO BE BLOCKED

The copyright violations have gone on long enough! Christ. JBsupreme (talk) 06:34, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I second the motion. Kevin Forsyth (talk) 03:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Celebrity Big Brother UK (2009)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Celebrity Big Brother UK (2009), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrity Big Brother UK (2009). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CelebrityJuiceLARGE.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CelebrityJuiceLARGE.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:34, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Barsocchini (writer)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Peter Barsocchini (writer), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0058302. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:05, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images listed for deletion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

Image:2846917640a4055623887b346887043l-1-.jpg

Thank you. Kevin Forsyth (talk) 02:47, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Loosedvd.jpg

~~Image Copyright problem~~
Thank you for uploading Image:Loosedvd.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

~~If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 12:33, 27 October 2008 (UTC)~~ [reply]

October 2008

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to List of minor and recurring characters from Hollyoaks, you will be blocked from editing. ~~ [ジャム]^[talk] 20:56, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating new articles for minor Hollyoaks characters. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing. ~~ [ジャム]^[talk] 08:19, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Raviroy.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Raviroy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 05:29, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haha wow I just cannot believe this person is not blocked yet. JBsupreme (talk) 06:08, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Oceanterminaledin.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Oceanterminaledin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:07, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Image:Oceanterminaledin.jpg. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This image is from http://www.edinburghvacations.co.uk/scenes/edinburgh/OceanTerminal.htm and does not have a copyright compatible with Wikipedia. Kevin Forsyth (talk) 12:36, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hsm123logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hsm123logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Dirty Diegos

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dirty Diegos, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dirty Diegos seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dirty Diegos, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:10, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The X Factor (UK)

Please do not move pages to bad titles. Your move is considered vandalism and further such moves will result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. matt br 08:20, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally while discussion about it is underway, as you did to Late Night Hollyoaks. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. You need to provide a source before changing the title and moving the page. Please do so before moving this page again. ~~ [ジャム]^[talk] 19:42, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Lucy Allan

An article that you have been involved in editing, Lucy Allan, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy Allan. Thank you. —Politizer ^talk/_contribs 15:59, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Wtitle.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Wtitle.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Life Stories

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bonadea (talk) 09:39, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Piers Morgan Show, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Blowdart | ^talk 10:04, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Tannery

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Tannery, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://latestbooks.wordpress.com/2009/01/30/latest-book-by-sherrie-hewson-the-tannery. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:TheTannery.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:TheTannery.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:02, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:TheTannery.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:TheTannery.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:02, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:The Tannery.jpg

I added the relevant fair use rationale. Should be ok now. TheRetroGuy (talk) 12:13, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jade Goody name

I have changed it back to Goody, because although she is now married, we do not know that she has changed her name. Until we know and can source it reliably, it needs to stay as Goody and not Tweed. I hope you understand why I changed it. Sky83 (talk) 13:56, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed it back to Goody. I am asking you nicely to please not change it again. We do not know whether she will be changing her name to Tweed at all, whether privately or professionally or legally and until we know one way or the other, it should stay as Goody. She will probably change to Tweed, but we are not the ones to make the determination of that. Just leave it for a couple of days and when we know what will be happening, feel free to change it if that's the choice she makes. Katie Price/Andre has little baring on this since she has said that she has privately taken Peter's surname and therefore she is credited as both Price and Andre. Please leave me a message if you have an issue with this, rather than start edit warring on the page. Sky83 (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Probably a good opportunity to review WP:RS and WP:BLP; also please bear in mind we will probably have some newish editors who will want to change this and not fully understand those policies. That's what the editor's note is for, to alert them to the effect of those policies. Thanks. --Rodhull andemu 19:35, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Palmqe2.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Palmqe2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:18, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Palmqe2.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Palmqe2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:18, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Palmqe2.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Palmqe2.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 18:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Ondonstud.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Ondonstud.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. --Geniac (talk) 05:06, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films starring Angelina Jolie

I don't think we normally category films in this fashion, furthermore, in many of these films you added she isn't always the star, but may be a supporting actress (i.e. The Good Shepherd). –xeno (talk) 21:20, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding this non-existent category, go back and remove this from all of the pages that you put it on otherwise you will be reported for vandalism! magnius (talk) 21:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is not vandalism, Magnius, please remember to assume good faith. –xeno (talk) 21:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edits. See User:Good Olfactory/CFD#By actor to get an idea of our current practices; we do not categorize films in this manner. Please add {{db-author}} to the category you created as well, to speed the cleanup along. –xeno (talk) 21:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kate Winslet filmography

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kate Winslet filmography, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

There is surely no need for this to have its own article? Will Kate's own page not suffice?

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ╟─Treasury Tag►contribs─╢ 21:36, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Separating filmographies

You did not even broach removing the filmographies for Kate Winslet and Angelina Jolie on their respective talk pages. When you are considering a major change to a high profile articles, or a featured article like Jolie's, it is completely inappropriate not to discuss it first. Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:46, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kate Winslet filmography

I have nominated Kate Winslet filmography, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Winslet filmography. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:52, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Campus (nightclub)

A tag has been placed on Campus (nightclub) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ~~ [ジャム]^[t - c] 20:38, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Stvnewsident.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Stvnewsident.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 20:07, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of BigBlueBaby.com

A tag has been placed on BigBlueBaby.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 11:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of BigBlueBaby.com

A tag has been placed on BigBlueBaby.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. God Emperor (talk) 16:39, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warning re inappropriate move of Newlywed

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Newlywed, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. We have some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Nancy ^talk 08:50, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Americans of Scottish decent

I notice that this category you created is unpopulated (empty). In other words, no Wikipedia pages belong to it. If it remains unpopulated for four days, it may be deleted, without discussion, in accordance with Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#C1. I'm notifying you in case you wish to (re-)populate it by adding [[Category:Americans of Scottish decent]] to articles/subcategories that belong in it.

I blanked the category page. This will not, in itself, cause the category to be deleted. It serves to document (in the page history) that the category was empty at the time of blanking and also to alert other watchers that the category is in jeopardy. You are welcome to revert the blanking if you wish. However, doing so will not prevent deletion if the category remains empty.

If you created the category in error, or it is no longer needed, you can speed up the deletion process by tagging it with {{db-author}}.

I am a human being, not a bot, so you can contact me if you have questions about this. Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 19:46, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced stuff

Hi. I see you put back the unreferenced stuff I removed from Hell's Kitchen (UK) and Carol McGiffin. I have removed it again because it is not just unreferenced. It also states that somebody has been lying. This is not something we should ever say unless we can prove it. It could constitute libel. If you can find reliable references then by all means put it back with the references but please leave it out until then. --DanielRigal (talk) 19:20, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Mobologo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mobologo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Ghostthemusical.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ghostthemusical.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:06, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fake twitter accounts

Please stop adding fake Twitter accounts as external links within Wikipedia articles. That is not a proper use of an external link section. --auburnpilot talk 04:19, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

blocked

I've blocked you from editing because there seem to be no encylclopedic edits from this account. Gwen Gale (talk) 03:30, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Dirty Diegos

I have nominated Dirty Diegos, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirty Diegos. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. PXK ^T /_C 17:36, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Britannia High logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Britannia High logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 05:40, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ghostthemusical.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ghostthemusical.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 08:20, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheTannery.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheTannery.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:22, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sotv.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sotv.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 03:16, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Tannery

The article The Tannery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article lacks independent and non-trivial sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Y u no be Russavia ^{ლ(ಠ益ಠლ)} 05:42, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:STV News at Six.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:STV News at Six.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:25, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Graham Norton Show.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Graham Norton Show.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:19, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:The Graham Norton Show.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:The Graham Norton Show.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:03, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hotsauce TV

The article Hotsauce TV has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

TV company that does not seem to pass guidelines for corps on Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 20:54, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cara Horgan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cara Horgan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cara Horgan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 07:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:London Eye at sunset 2.jpg

The file File:London Eye at sunset 2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Low quality. Superseded by files at c:Category:London Eye at night.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:45, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amber Beattie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amber Beattie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Beattie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Roasted (talk) 01:02, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Loosewomen333.jpg

Image copyright problem with Image:Andrea presenter l.jpg

Your uploads

Image copyright problem with Image:Gm4tv.jpg

Image copyright problem with Image:Fionaphillips.jpg

Image copyright problem with Image:Lwset.jpg

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tmorningnew.jpg)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Thegrahamshow.jpg)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Loose-women-banner.jpg)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Loosewomenlogo.jpg)

Speedy deletion of Skill Force

Proposed deletion of Forgive me (Leona Lewis song)

fake protection

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rightnowleon.jpg)

Image source problem with Image:Bbcscotlandstudios.jpg

Replaceable fair use Image:Bbcscotlandstudios.jpg

Image:Thefamilytitle.jpg

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hot sauce.jpg}

PD-claims

Speedy deletion of Stewart Hannah

September 2008

Orphaned non-free media (Image:HOLLYOAKS.gif)

Welcome

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Celebjuice.jpg}

THIS ACCOUNT NEEDS TO BE BLOCKED

AfD nomination of Celebrity Big Brother UK (2009)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CelebrityJuiceLARGE.jpg)

Peter Barsocchini (writer)

Images listed for deletion

Image copyright problem with Image:Loosedvd.jpg

October 2008

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Raviroy.jpg}

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Oceanterminaledin.jpg}

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hsm123logo.jpg)

Notability of Dirty Diegos

The X Factor (UK)

November 2008

AfD nomination of Lucy Allan

Orphaned non-free media (File:Wtitle.jpg)

Speedy deletion of Life Stories

February 2009

The Tannery

Disputed fair use rationale for File:TheTannery.jpg}

Disputed fair use rationale for File:TheTannery.jpg}

Re:The Tannery.jpg

Jade Goody name

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Palmqe2.jpg}

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Palmqe2.jpg}

Replaceable fair use Image:Palmqe2.jpg

File copyright problem with File:Ondonstud.jpg

Category:Films starring Angelina Jolie

Proposed deletion of Kate Winslet filmography

Separating filmographies

AfD nomination of Kate Winslet filmography

Speedy deletion of Campus (nightclub)

File copyright problem with File:Stvnewsident.jpg

Speedy deletion of BigBlueBaby.com

Speedy deletion of BigBlueBaby.com

Warning re inappropriate move of Newlywed

Category:Americans of Scottish decent

Unreferenced stuff

License tagging for File:Mobologo.jpg

Problems with upload of File:Ghostthemusical.jpg

Fake twitter accounts

blocked

Articles for deletion nomination of Dirty Diegos

Orphaned non-free image File:Britannia High logo.jpg

Orphaned non-free image File:Ghostthemusical.jpg

Orphaned non-free image File:TheTannery.jpg

Orphaned non-free image File:Sotv.jpg

Proposed deletion of The Tannery

Orphaned non-free image File:STV News at Six.jpg

Orphaned non-free image File:The Graham Norton Show.jpg

File source problem with File:The Graham Norton Show.jpg

Proposed deletion of Hotsauce TV

Nomination of Cara Horgan for deletion

ArbCom elections are now open!

Proposed deletion of File:London Eye at sunset 2.jpg

Nomination of Amber Beattie for deletion