User talk:Further Than Beyond
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Further Than Beyond! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! :Jay8g [V•T•E] 02:44, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Outdated content on Ethiopia wiki. Also clear bias.
[edit]Here’s a 2021 study. “The position of L3/M and N haplogroups in different sub-clades may suggest this macrohaplogroup have originated in east Africa prior to the migration of the first Homo sapiens to Asia. The L3/M/N conventionally associated with the mitochondrial out-of-Africa scenario is widely distributed in Sudanese groups unknown of having history of migration or admixture with Asian or European groups, consistent with our suggestion that the major mitochondrial haplotype differentiation occurred well prior to the exodus event (Elhassan et al., 2014), then propagating the N carriers through migration and drift. For example the presence of Haplogroups RO in populations like Beja, Arabs Nubians and Masalit, could hardly be taken as a result of migration from Asia to East Africa as suggested by similar presence in the Arabian peninsula (Abu-Amero et al., 2008; Gandini et al., 2016), given the cultural, genetic ethnic and demographic background of these groups. Some authors argue that this haplogroup, as well as other Eurasian haplogroups including U3 and TI among Beja, may have been brought to Sudan by two routes one from North Africa, and the other through the present Ethiopia and Eritrea (Kivisild et al., 2004; Krings et al., 1999). On the other hand, an African origin of these macro haplogroups has been argued for in the literature (Quintana-Murci et al., 1999)”. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214540020301924https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214540020301924 ScholarMate1 (talk) 15:26, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- This has been discussed and responded to already, and as you have been told multiple times, none of the information cited is outdated nor biased which is what you are doing by clearing peer reviewed and cited academic content from geneticists and researchers. You have also not added any new 2023 studies which you claimed to do while clearing the material you did not like. Sir, you literally have just used the same edits from your other accounts: Special:Contributions/H3r3cookiecookie38 & Special:Contributions/ZipthatChop. Further Than Beyond (talk) 15:52, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
No problem
[edit]Hi Further Than Beyond, no worries! You didn't need to remove your comment, I just randomly saw it in my watchlist. Asking for help is always a good idea! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- OK, awesome, I really appreciate it! Also, as an established and older editor, could you briefly advise me in how to report any prior user editors that have been warned, and even blocked for article disruption, as well as meat/sock puppetry? I would really like any help in how to deal with such cases, as you can sadly see the current situation. I also do not want to revert any more edits on the article, and be accused of Wikipedia:Edit warring. Further Than Beyond (talk) 16:09, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- I managed to somewhat find my way around and filed a complaint. I'll wait to see what decision is taken, again, thanks. Further Than Beyond (talk) 17:06, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
November 2024
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.