User talk:G. Trimalchio

June 2023[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:34, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

G. Trimalchio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m absolutely not a sockpuppet. I have been following this discussion and decided to respond.G. Trimalchio (talk) 14:58, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Every sock denies being one. You'll have to do better than "I'm not a sock". 331dot (talk) 15:05, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Excuse me? How can I proof something I didn’t do? G. Trimalchio (talk) 15:08, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

G. Trimalchio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have to do better than saying I didn’t do it, what is this? I’m absolutely not a sockpuppet. How can I proof something I didn’t do? Why don’t you adhere to assume good faith? G. Trimalchio (talk) 15:11, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What, then, is your relationship with User:Awater01? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:29, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We both study philosophy at the same university. He talked to me about this matter and I decided to respond, that’s all. Don’t you think this is a slight overreaction? G. Trimalchio (talk) 15:42, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

G. Trimalchio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So what’s the deal here? I made an account to engage in a discussion and suddenly I’m a sockpuppet? What is going on here? G. Trimalchio (talk) 19:21, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

CU Confirmed clear cut socking. Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:30, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You created this account immediately after another account, indistinguishable from this one, was blocked for incivility and edit warring at Baruch Spinoza; this account immediately began editing at the same place. This falls either WP:SOCK or WP:MEAT; in either case, it is unacceptable. --jpgordon^{&#x1d122 ;𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:27, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@--jpgordon, Sorry, but I’m not actively recruited by anyone to participate in this discussion. I simply heard there was a dispute here and I decided to participate. One of the first things I did, by the way, was asking for a request for comments. If I tried to ask for other people’s opinion, then how is this actively helping one specific person? G. Trimalchio (talk) 19:35, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As you continue to deny the exceedingly obvious connection between you and multiple other accounts (I can actually see you toggling between your accounts), I've revoked your access to this talk page. An appeal can be made via your main account.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:39, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]