User talk:G00dnews

Welcome[edit]

Hello, G00dnews, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:41, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the TIP about tildes.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I asked a question on some page earlier this eve, but can't remember what page. It was regarding a |thumb| not being created for a 400px photo I uploaded to the page for Lucie Arnaz. I thought I did it right. OH! I just looked again, and it is there now. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucie_Arnaz Hurray. I wonder if you can tell if someone fixed it, or if I DID do it right. G00dnews (talk) 01:58, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi G00dnews, in response to your question the image was fixed by User:David Biddulph with this edit. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 02:29, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Howicus! So I assume the wiki automatically creates a thumbnail, and you don't have to add |thumb| or insert a number under "size". Very cool, if that's true.

It looks great now.

Actually, the "thumb" just wasn't needed here because that image was in an infobox. If the image were by itself, the "thumb" part would be needed. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 06:15, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

potential conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, G00dnews. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:41, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

your user name[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "G00dnews", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is the name of a group, organization, company, or website (www.goodnewsnetwork.org). If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:41, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My username is certainly not the name of an organization or group or website that I know of, so it does not violate your policy. G00dnews (talk) 01:54, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking as an admin who has reviewed hundreds of reports on potentially problematic names I do not see any problem at all here. This name has been registered without any issues since 2006, and there is nothing to indicate any actual connection to an organization. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:21, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Bb! G00dnews

File:Lucy Arnez at Kennedy Center's Twain Prize 2013.jpg[edit]

The bottom of the page where you got the photo File:Lucy Arnez at Kennedy Center's Twain Prize 2013.jpg reads "Copyright © 2005 - 2012 Good News Network."[1] Since Good News Network holds the copyright in File:Lucy Arnez at Kennedy Center's Twain Prize 2013, they will need to follow the "For images" directions at WP:DONATEIMAGE. -- Jreferee (talk) 02:35, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That copyright notice doesn't apply to photos. They use CC photos on the website often. It refers to the website as a delivery medium of news. I took the photo and uploaded it under CC license with the Wikipedia recommended license. G00dnews (talk) 03:56, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]