User talk:GMS1

September 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page GMS has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Grafen (talk) 10:29, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Tropical Storm Zeta (2005). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Grafen (talk) 10:32, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Powers (TV series). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Grafen (talk) 14:45, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to 2010 Qur'an-burning controversy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Wackywace ^{converse | contribs} 11:10, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nancy ^talk 15:50, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GMS1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

if you look at my past edits you will notice that i have made some positive edits to wikipedia and i was just having a childish moment(dont we all) and will not do it again now i understand the concequences

Decline reason:

Looking through your contributions, it seems you've had several "childish moments" - almost all of your edits are vandalism. I'd have blocked you indefinitely. As it is, you're only blocked for a week, so you can prove that you do understand the consequences starting on the 26th. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 16:41, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Presumably this is you as well. You really shouldn't be using an IP to circumvent a block; see WP:Block evasion. Alzarian16 (talk) 09:26, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]