User talk:GabrielG2023

This is GabrielG2023's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:

The submission appears to be written in French. This is the English language Wikipedia; we can only accept articles written in the English language. Please provide a high-quality English language translation of your submission. Otherwise, you may write it in the French Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Falia2/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 14:43, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Falia2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 14:43, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Widescape (July 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the sources are reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Widescape and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:02, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WS250 moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to WS250. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please do not move this back to the main article space before responding to the COI query posted below. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:30, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Falia2. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:WS250, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves[edit]

Hello, Falia2,

Please stop moving pages around multiple times. It's very disruptive and only serves to draw administrator attention to your work (which is what happened with me). There is no reason you should need to keep moving pages around to different titles, especially when they are still in a draft stage of work. Please think through a page move before you do it and do not act impulsively. Each time you move a page, you create a redirect and, in most cases, these redirects are unnecessary. If you look through your Contributions page, you'll see all of the red links from redirects that have been deleted so it's causing unnecessary work for others to clean up. Please leave the draft at Draft:WS250 until it gets approved and the next time it will be moved will be by the AFC reviewer. Also, do not move your draft articles to User space unless it is your own. You shouldn't take over a User page that belongs to another editor even if they are long gone or not using the page title. I have moved this page back to Draft space. Please try to edit constructively.

If you have questions about anything I've said, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Falia2,

You are continuing to move pages like Draft:Widescape_WS250 around multiple times. Please stop this habit. It's disruptive. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:03, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is clearly a paid editor (or editors) trying to circumvent the Terms of Use and Wikipedia's policies for their own financial gain. S0091 (talk) 16:09, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[edit]

Hello Falia2. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Falia2. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Falia2|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. S0091 (talk) 14:55, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

\

Your submission at Articles for creation: Widescape WS250 (August 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Probable conflict of interest, likely paid editing. It is not entirely clear whether the originator is trying to create an article about the company, Widescape, or its product, the WS250, a model of snowmobile. The article does not speak for itself and does not state either why the company satisfies corporate notability or why the product satisfies product notability.

Does the author of this draft have any sort of financial or other connection with the subject of this draft? Please read the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy and make any required disclosures.

You may ask for advice about conflict of interest at the Teahouse.

If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Widescape WS250 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. S0091 (talk) 18:54, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In addition you are being disruptive in general which will result in a block. S0091 (talk) 18:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: WS250 (August 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

S0091 (talk) 19:07, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:16, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Falia2,

I have asked you several times not to keep moving around the same articles to different page titles in different namespaces but you have continued to do so. This is a brief block to let you know that this disruptive editing is wasting the time of other editors and must stop. Please do not continue when this block expires or the next one will be considerably longer. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Falia2, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Falia2|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:10, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are not being honest in your response at the AfC Help desk. It is clear Falia has a financial relationship with Widescape and you have been told to disclose that relationship now 4 times. You got by with it on the French Wikipedia but you will not get by with it here. S0091 (talk) 13:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Falia2/Widescape[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Falia2/Widescape, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. S0091 (talk) 19:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website, I have blocked this account from editing. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable, regardless of the username that you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you must disclose who is paying you to edit here.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change of your current account here. The new username that you choose must represent you as an individual person, and it must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
If you prefer to change the username on this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page (this page): {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken or in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Appeals: If your username does not represent a group, organization, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you.

Secretlondon (talk) 18:42, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Before an admin unblocks this user, please see this which makes clear Widescape is their client, along with the previous block, all the warnings they have received about declaring their paid status and the other disruption they have caused. This is clear UPE. S0091 (talk) 18:54, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Falia[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Falia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. S0091 (talk) 20:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

GabrielG2023 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Gabriel Gervais (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Sorry for all the changes it will not happen again Falia2 (talk) 12:13, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

User is unresponsive. Yamla (talk) 10:35, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How specifically do you plan to adhere to WP:UPE? What will you do differently if unblocked? What do you plan to write about instead? Also, please address your attempt to mislead us with regard to your relationship with Widescape. I'll leave this request open for 72 hours to give you a chance to fully address these concerns. Now, not later, is the time for you to be open and honest with us. --Yamla (talk) 12:19, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have now been unblocked. You are required to start adhering to WP:UPE and WP:COI and are expected to refrain from writing directly about Widescape and anything else for which you have a conflict of interest. --Yamla (talk) 15:59, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to see you ignored this information. --Yamla (talk) 13:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Concern regarding Draft:Widescape's WS250[edit]

Hello, GabrielG2023. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Widescape's WS250, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Widescape's WS250[edit]

Hello, GabrielG2023. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Widescape's WS250".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:14, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]