User talk:Galkaha

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adopt-a-Pet.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mdann52 (talk) 15:33, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Galkaha, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:17, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Galkaha: I have read all the help pages and I made sure to comply with requirements. I am not affiliated with Adopt-a-Pet.com. I just think since the Petfinder, the competing for-profit organization has a Wikipedia page, it will be fair to have a page for a non-profit. Don't you think? The editor who deleted the page indicated copyright violation, but I think he is wrong, since no copyrighted materials were used in the creation of the article, they were cited as references, and if this is a problem, I can remove them. I put quite a bit of time into the article, and now I can't recover the latest version in my sandbox, which is quite annoying.

Hi Galkaha, Please read this page about pages for competitors. Pages should have their own notability, not just because their competitor is notable. Also, you cannot copy text from another page and simply reference it. It must be written in your own words. You can read this page for more information. Lego K^ontribs T^alkM 00:45, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I did read this page and yes, I think Adopt-a-pet.com has its own notability. And it was not deleted because of notability but because of copyright, which I don't agree with since I did write everything with my own words and typed with my own two fingers. Any similarity in wording is coincidental for sure, so please let me know where it appears to be a violation, and I will be happy to change the wording. Also, is there a way to restore the latest version of the article? Thanks.

Please provide substantiation about the "notability" of this website first. And, a quick hint, you can sign you message by placing ~~~~ at then end of it tho show something like that : Amqui (talk) 03:43, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think if you see the article I wrote (will anybody tell me how it can be restored???), the notability will be obvious. Adopt-a-pet.com is THE LARGEST pet adoption non-profit in North America. Over 12000 shelters advertize their pets on the web site. I have seen CNN Headline News program recommending it in the last two weeks. It is a big deal company that has been around for over 10 years. Galkaha (talk) 17:02, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

From your statements here it still does not appear that you have read WP:N. You will need to provide specific independent third party reliable sources WP:RS that cover the topic in a significant manner. Age of the business doesnt matter, that they do good work doesnt matter that they claim to be the largest doesnt matter without actual specific coverage. Can you provide that coverage and not just claim "i saw something on TV some time"? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:08, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article I wrote, which has been deleted, and I keep asking how I can restore it (will anybody help???), has references to [1] Guidestar charity check http://www.guidestar.org/organizations/95-4761276/humane-america-animal-foundation.aspx [2] Charity navigator http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=11882 which are independent organizations providing information and rating non-profit organizations. Just now, the Google News search for "Adopt-a-Pet.Com" returned the following unsponsored links:

- "Adopt Me! Shasta Wants to Be Your Velcro" People Magazine-Sep 28, 2012

To learn more about her, visit her Adopt-a-Pet.com profile. Meet last week's adoptable pets, Chance and Rebecca. Adopting a pet is an ...

- "October is Adopt-a-Dog Month—Could One of These Be Your New ..." Patch.com-Oct 1, 2012

... athttp://www.adoptapet.com/animal-shelters and you can use a website like Adopt-a-Pet.com to search for pets for adoption at all these types ...

- "N.J. man who left Rottweiler dogs in hot car pleads guilty to animal ..." Examiner.com-Oct 5, 2012

Let 'em know you saw "Lava" on Adopt-a-Pet.com! Website: http://www.justinbartlettanimalrescue.org ..., which are all independent reputable news sources.

In fact, I think my article has a much better set of external sources than Petfinder.org, which is published. Please help me restore my article and please read it before we discuss further. I did expect that I would need to edit it before it is accepted. I never expected it to be just deleted like this! Galkaha (talk) 17:31, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1) the fact that other articles currently suck and may not meet the Wikipedia criteria is not a reason to allow additional articles that do not meet the criteria.

2) a rating from a charity rating service is not significant coverage

3) brief passing mentions "you can use a service like adoptapet or petfinder" is not significant coverage

do you have anything else? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:00, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You can also ask to receive the content of the deleted article (which will most likely be accepted if you wrote it). Please see Category:Wikipedia_administrators_who_will_provide_copies_of_deleted_articles, and ask an admin of the list to help you. Amqui (talk) 18:04, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Dear Amqui, the link you provided does not show anything useful (The Wiki page.... does not exist). Can you give more detailed instructions on how to request the article? And once again, it was deleted by someone I don't remember the user name now, for copyright violation, which is totally wrong, and not for any of the reasons brought up above by people who have not in fact read the article. While I agree with othercrap approach in principle, because of the importance of Wikipedia, it amounts to Wikipedia supporting some companies over others, which I don't think is it's goal. In fact, this whole process has undermined quite a bit my faith in reliability of articles provided and I think I will be referring people to Wikipedia less in the future, and will not use it as much myself anymore.Galkaha (talk) 18:21, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is here to provide an encyclopedia, collecting content that third party reliable sources have found worthy of discussion. Period. I am sure the organization does wonderful things, but until there is third party coverage, they dont get an article. And as long as you dont have the third party source significant coverage hurdle met, you are wasting your time,'' because EVEN IF an administrator temporarily restores the content, unless you have the sources, ITS GONNA GET DELETED AGAIN. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:54, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Even if that's true, nothing refrain an user to retrieve content he wrote if it got deleted. Galkaha, just click on a username on the page I gave you, and ask for the content of your article on his talk page. Amqui (talk) 03:18, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Information about conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Galkaha. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:22, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adopt-a-Pet.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Wywin (talk) 18:20, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adopt-a-Pet.com.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mdann52 (talk) 20:53, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adopt-a-Pet.com.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Go Phightins! 21:41, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Galkaha, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 05:49, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Adopt-a-Pet.com, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ravens freak0624 (talk) 19:29, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I will keep working on improving the article. Thank you for giving it a green light Galkaha (talk) 20:03, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adopt-a-Pet.com for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adopt-a-Pet.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adopt-a-Pet.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light21 16:27, 18 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Light2021 (talk • contribs)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clustering standard errors (November 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads more like someone's essay on the topic, and also gives "how to" advice.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clustering standard errors and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Clustering standard errors, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:30, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Clustering standard errors[edit]

Hello, Galkaha. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Clustering standard errors".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Mjs1991 (talk) 01:43, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]