User talk:Gazo65

Hello, Gazo65! Welcome to Wikipedia! We're so glad you're here! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills, the sandbox is for you. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!

— Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 06:08, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Whistleblower appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this. Thank you. Reyk _YO! 03:29, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017[edit]

Your recent editing history at WikiLeaks shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 23:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for continued edit-warring[edit]

You have been blocked twice for edit-warring. Yet, that hasn't stopped you from pursuing your agenda at WikiLeaks and removing again material you've removed before. I have therefore blocked you for two weeks. If you persist after expiration of this block, the next block will probably be indefinite.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

OK, you've been told about our policies and guidelines before. This edit signals that you're not really understanding this. Let me be very clear:

Please don't remove content ("blanking") without a valid reason.
Please use edit summaries, especially when removing sourced material.
Please don't mark major edits as "minor edits" (see Help:Minor edit).
Especially don't do any of the above in contravention of consensus.

Please ask me if you have any questions. Neutrality^talk 02:26, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Embassy of Ecuador, London. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. I have added "not" to my restoration of the earlier edit which should have been present before. Philip Cross (talk) 12:40, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Potential conflict of interest[edit]

Your edits, which are frequently concerned with WikiLeaks and Julian Assange and related articles, may suggest that you have a COI. For information on Wikipedia['s policy on this issue, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Philip Cross (talk) 12:48, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019[edit]

By now you should have understood that WP:RS are needed for WP:V - thanks, otherwise your assertions are WP:OR at Montebllo Islands. JarrahTree 09:53, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]