User talk:Gb6491

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Gb6491, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Jmundo (talk) 05:39, 6 September 2010 (UTC)\[reply]

I disagree. The changes I made included a direct quote from an article that was incorrectly summarized in the article. Other changes reflected generally accepted/civil views of the person in question during the period cited in the article. I imagine birth certificates and marriage licensees would support the validity of the changes I made. GB6491

July 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edits you made to Theresa Sparks, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SparsityProblem (talk) 20:14, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. The changes I made included a direct quote from an article that was incorrectly summarized in the article. Other changes reflected generally accepted/civil views of the person in question during the period cited in the article. I imagine birth certificates and marriage licensees would support the validity of the changes I made. GB6491

Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia editing guidelines. In particular, MOS:IDENTITY says:

"Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to using the gendered nouns, pronouns, and possessive adjectives that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. This applies when referring to any phase of that person's life." (bold emphasis added) Thanks, SparsityProblem (talk) 21:41, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I stand corrected in regards to my edit of the gendered nouns, pronouns, and possessive adjectives during that phase of the person's life. Thank you.

However, my other edit involved a direct quote and as such would seem perfectly permissible under our guidelines; in particular, MOS:IDENTITY says: "As always in a direct quotation, use the original text, even if the quoted text is inconsistent with the preceding guidelines." (bold emphasis added) Thanks, GB6491

If you believe there's an error in one of the direct quotations, feel free to correct the error and use an informative edit summary. Of course, the source of the quotation should verifiably support your edit. SparsityProblem (talk) 06:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]