Jump to content

User talk:Gelchi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Snazzy (musician) (May 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Reading Beans were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Reading Beans Talk to the Beans? 10:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Gelchi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Reading Beans Talk to the Beans? 10:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

[edit]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Snazzymike. Thank you. Reading Beans Talk to the Beans? 14:10, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry @Reading Beans that is not my account you could identify it with the IP address, i'm really sorry if you think i went wrong please forgive me. Gelchi (talk) 14:19, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Snazzy the Optimist for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Snazzy the Optimist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snazzy the Optimist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Reading Beans Talk to the Beans? 14:19, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Reading Beans Please Sir/Ma, i will really appreciate if you could please mentor me on here because i'm interested in learning more Sir/Ma. Gelchi (talk) 00:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm Currently blocked because of my disruptive editing which i know what i did was wrong, please help me Sir/Ma. Gelchi (talk) 00:24, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 00:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gelchi (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi sir/ma, i'm appealing because i was blocked for making disruptive edits which i clearly admit to. Please sir/ma unblock!! i promise to retract from making disruptive editing or go against the Wikipedia rules, I'm a new user and i enjoy editing please unblock me sir/ma. Gelchi (talk) 02:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I think it's a little too soon, and you didn't talk at all about how you might be a positive contributor if unblocked. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:31, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gelchi (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was blocked from Wikipedia because of my disruptive editing and i totally admit that i didn't abide by the rules governing here because i'm still new on here and have not gotten experiences, i closed a deletion nomination discussion because i taught the consensus for keep has been reached to save the article according to the nominator. I know what i did was wrong because it's totally against wikipedia, i will never go against wikipedia rules again or make disruptive edits again. I promise to undergo a period of mentorship or probation with a well experienced editor advising me and i promise to contribute on here and abide by the rules. Please Unblock Gelchi (talk) 00:15, 31 May 2022 (UTC)}[reply]

Decline reason:

You're a sock puppet of Snazzymike. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:32, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.