User talk:GeneZub

Rehoboth Carpenter family

Thanks for intervening. But don't expect any cooperation from Iwanafish. Please see "Clarification" section on Rehoboth Carpenter family discussion page.GeneZub (talk) 04:57, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

sure, no problem. The best anyone can do is get good information from all previous versions of this article somehow agreed upon and merged. riffic (talk) 08:58, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

I have reverted your recent changes to Rehoboth Carpenter family. Sticking chunks of text in square brackets in the article is not the way to resolve content disputes. Please discuss on the article's talk page in an attempt to reach consensus.  – ukexpat (talk) 01:30, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. I did read the talk page and I understand your frustration. However, the changes that you made and that I reverted are not the way to create a balanced article. If you are having difficulty reaching consensus for whatever reason, please take it to dispute resolution. Thank you. – ukexpat (talk) 12:38, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Please go ahead and remove the tags that you think are no longer necessary. I was just trying to get back to a relatively stable version but couldn't figure out which tags were no longer relevant. – ukexpat (talk) 15:02, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Survey

Rehoboth Carpenter Family - Regarding Compromise Article (in Discussion section - bottom of page) dated 20 April 2009 - Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with Jrcrin001 (talk) 23:44, 20 April 2009 (UTC). John R. Carpenter Jrcrin001 (talk) 23:44, 20 April 2009 (UTC)