User talk:Genedoug

Hi there, Genedoug - Before creating any more pages, please take a moment to read more about what Wikipedia is and how articles should be written. The two that you created, Reilley -- Masterpiece Theater and Other uses for Wiki program, will likely be deleted as they are unencyclopedic.

The following links provide some good information for newcomers about Wikipedia:

Thanks, and best of luck with your future editing. - Tapir Terrific 02:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008[edit]

Thanks for experimenting with the page List of pseudosciences and pseudoscientific concepts on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. II | (t - c) 01:33, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fireworks City, Oklahoma was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! sonia♫ 22:10, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fireworks City, Oklahoma concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fireworks City, Oklahoma, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:17, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Fireworks City, Oklahoma[edit]

Hello Genedoug. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Fireworks City, Oklahoma.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fireworks City, Oklahoma}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 13:01, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Apex effect for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apex effect is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apex effect until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - 2/0 (cont.) 17:45, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]