User talk:General Cui

Welcome! User:General Cui 05:24, 17 December 2006 (UTC) Hello, General Cui, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:[reply]

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ^Blank ^Verse 07:23, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cui[edit]

Because Kiwi is stated to be the same strength as Vegeta before he went to Earth, and when Zarbon is reading off Vegeta's powerlevel on Namek, he and Dodoria confirm, after Vegeta has powered up well beyond Kiwi's powerlevel that he is stronger than they are. They act surprised at his powerlevel ONLY after he is higher than 18,000, which is what Kiwi's powerlevel would be, based on the manga. It is thus confirmed that Kiwi is weaker than Dodoria and Zarbon.

Daishokaioshin 05:02, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

.................................................. 05:23, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vgvukvukv[edit]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. User:Zoe|(talk) 08:44, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MER-C 08:46, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

auto blocked[edit]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 67.165.44.181 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: —Pilotguy (push to talk) 16:26, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that explains a lot, doesn't it? You were both creating nonsense articles. It appears that you got caught up in your own block. And you both just happen to be editing from Steubenville? User:Zoe|(talk) 09:32, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  Please unblock, I primise
ill never vandalize with Patent
Nonsense again...! -- Master 09:38, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

what am I

AfDs[edit]

If you're going to keep putting articles up for deletion, can you please actually follow the insructions listed on the page? Nemu 01:01, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Dodoria, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. [1] JRP 03:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please be civil[edit]

Could I suggest that mundane editorial disagreements are most likely to resolve quickly and productively when editors observe the following:

Remain polite per WP:Civility.
Solicit feedback and ask questions.
Keep the discussion focused. Concentrate on a small set of related matters and resolve them to the satisfaction of all parties.
Focus on the subject rather than on the personalities of the editors.

Thanks! Please refrain from your personal attacks, such as the ones on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dodoria. JRP 03:20, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as sockpuppet[edit]

You have been indefblocked as a sockpuppet. --Desk banana 11:07, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

General Cui (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise not to vandalize again!

Decline reason:

Requested reason for unblocking does not address the reason for blocking. --Deskana, Champion of the Frozen Wastes 09:13, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The unblock request which you just posted, and which has been removed, in my opinion absolutely precludes your ever being allowed to edit here again. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:30, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]