User talk:Genovese12345

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 21:16, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

Connie Bea Hope will survive. I'm pretty confident, and nothing is permanent so if it is deleted we can move it to userspace, fix it up, and try again.

Doing AfDs of similar subjects to prove a point is frowned upon. I know you were acting in good faith, but that's not the best approach (ie. unhelpful and likely to get you in trouble). Keep adding good stuff to the encyclopedia. Wikipedia takes a bit of getting used to and there tends to be a bias against regional topics that aren't covered in the New York Times, but usually the good guys win. :) Happy Memorial Day. Please let me know if I can ever be of any help. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:07, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested in Virginia Greer. It could use expansion. If not, no worries. ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:25, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Alabama Catholics[edit]

I have nominated Category:Alabama Catholics (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Drawn Some (talk) 10:54, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

AlexforME (talk) 15:07, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I altered your comment[edit]

I apologize up front for altering your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barney B. Rasor, I know that it is very unusual to do that, but I changed your second "Keep" to "Comment", you can't !vote more than once. Even though it is a discussion and not a vote it is inappropriate. Drawn Some (talk) 15:52, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Errol Sawyer[edit]

Please see the summaries for the most recent edits to Errol Sawyer; you may wish to take Benjiboi's hint and improve the article. -- Hoary (talk) 23:13, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BLPs[edit]

Hi, you may wish to review WP:BLP since you edit a lot of biographies. Drawn Some (talk) 21:53, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mobile municipal elections, 2009 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Localized city council elections of a mid-size city that fails WP:GNG outside some local sources, wasn't even bothered to be updated tells a lot about the notability of the subject.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret account 21:33, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]